User:RedHead102/Rural development/Htetnaingoo9 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

RedHead102


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RedHead102/Rural_development?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Rural development

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content -Your new adding content is relevant to the topic. I see that you developed much in the “The role of NGOs/non-profits in developing countries” section. I think that your contribution in this section is outstanding, and this is helpful to deeply understand how NGOs role is part of the ‘Rural development. I believe that new adding, a case study, is a good content for this topic.

Sources - All your sources and information are reliable for this topic. But I see that there is one source for the entire paragraph in your contribution. I would like to suggest that you should add more sources to your contribution.

Tone - Your contribution to this topic is neutral, and there is no bias.

Organization -I think that your contribution is well-organized, and it is easy to read for the general audience. There are not any serious grammatical or spelling errors in your contribution.

Overall Impression -

Your draft is really good. Your topic is a little too broad, but you narrowed this topic. Good Jobs!