User:Rednblu/History/preservation

< >This is a list of edits that I consider objectionable. I'm not making personal attacks; I'm factually commentating on content in a civil manner, which is specifically condoned by WP:NPA: "Personal attacks do not include civil language used to describe an editor's actions, and when made without involving their personal character, should not be construed as personal attacks. Stating "Your statement is a personal attack..." is not itself a personal attack—it is a statement regarding the actions of the user, not a statement about the user."

Andjam

 * Does not "assume good faith"/borderline personal attack.

JayJG

 * Personal attack against User:Magabund

Karl Meier

 * Described my comments as "a rant"
 * Reverted my userspace page

Pecher

 * Deleting cited and correct information and refusing to debate his edits on the talk page

Ragout

 * Wholesale deletion of relevant, correct, cited information.
 * Personal attacks, false accusations of breaking the 3RR.
 * Repeated unsigned comments, flippant tone
 * Flagrant violation of 3RR, , ,.
 * Large, unnecessary personal attack

Tasc

 * Removing cited information and restoring POV.
 * Removing fact tags instead of adding cites.
 * False accusation of lying. "you lying" . Changes his tune when I call him on it.

Timothy User

 * Compares anonymous editor to a murderer.
 * Falsely accuses Deuterium of being a sock puppet.
 * To anonymous editor, "you are incapable of answering a direct question".


 * Wrong editor on this last one...Timothy Usher 10:07, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Zeq
< >
 * Copyright violation/content spamming