User:Redsoxs33/Solar energy/Louistheyounger Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(RedSox33)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Redsoxs33/Solar energy


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Solar energy

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

- The negatives around solar are an important topic to bring up as we (hopefully) near independence from non renewable energy sources, so overall I think this topic is very relevant to the article and is a necessary addition.

- The lead could use a sentence about the changes, though this could be subjective, it's up to you, otherwise the lead seems to cover the article well.

- The content that has been added to the sandbox is very relevant and up to date.

- I think that the content being added serves to make the article more neutral - so really good job there! It was more biased before the the additions of Redsox33 et al.

- The grammar could use some work in general, sources are sprinkled in there appropriately. There are some extra capital letters in there.

- Overall really good start, seems like you have some good resources and a good topic that really modernizes the article. I would recommend, beside progressing, weaving everything together and making sure the sentences are complete.

Looking forward to reading the changes you make on the negatives of solar

your friendly reviewer

Louistheyounger