User:Reece.Ciampitti/Map puffer/Ascholzc Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Scytheoftheunholy, Reece.Ciampitti


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Map puffer


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article is written very clearly and all the information is interesting and well cited. I think one of the main things that could be improved is the lead, as it has barely any information. Maybe even just another sentence mentioning that it is eaten but toxic since that is interesting. In terms of sections I also find it slightly weird that two of your sections have only one sentence, I know it's important to have sections and be well organized but perhaps in this case it would be better to add these sentences to the lead section. The tone is very neutral and it you have a lot of good sources, I wonder if there is any more content you could include from so many sources but I know a lot of papers are very specific. The images are also useful, it's a really cute fish!

Overall I like what you have, and though it's not a lot of information I know how hard it is to find information on these species so I'm guessing you've used all you could. I would really just love to see the lead updated!