User:Reese2022/Pediatric nurse practitioner/Cadentf Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Reese2022


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Reese2022/Pediatric_nurse_practitioner?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pediatric nurse practitioner

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Initially reviewing Reese’s article regarding the information about a Pediatric Nurse Practitioner, I can tell the individual put a lot of work into lengthening and expanding the amount of information for other people that want to read about nurse practitioners. Overall I believe they did a very good job, they took it upon themselves to almost completely gut the article and rewrite it with in my opinion better formatting and more easily understandable sections. The only negative I have is I’m not sure if “practitions” is technically a word– but that is really the only thing that I’m seeing in here that needs to be corrected. Something I really enjoyed about reading this article is that they improved something that the majority of people wouldn’t even think of, which is the pros and the cons of this career field. This also proves that they are trying to maintain a neutral, unbiased tone in this article because they aren’t only talking about the good things about being a nurse practitioner. Furthermore, after reviewing their sources I believe that overall they provided and easily understandable, well written, reliable source-backed article.