User:Reesedog15/African feminism/PSCI226 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Reesedog15 African feminism additions draft review


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Reesedog15/African_feminism?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * African feminism
 * African feminism

Lead:
Updates to the lead are useful and bring the main topic of the article to more focus. The lead is precise and well sourced, framing the overall article to come well and is not overly detailed.

Content:
The added content is constructive and well researched. It brings in new concepts, people, and ideas that were previously not involved within the article itself. he content is to the point and up to date,

Tone/Balance:
There is no sign of any bias, in fact many of the additions make a strong effort to remind the reader of the diverse views, opinions and contributions that different people and cultures have made in the pursuit of African feminism.

Sources & References:
All added sources are strong and come from peer reviewed academic journals and refer to the points made.

Organization:
The article is clearly written and well formatted. It is free from grammatical errors and is thoughtfully split up.

Overall impressions:
Very good additions that contribute well to the article. It is well sourced and well formatted, and has an unbiased and diverse approach to laying out the information. If expanded upon more it would become even better.

Reesedog15 Response
Thanks for this feedback! I will continue to expand my draft before publishing. Best of luck with your article as well!