User:Reesegroover/Campylobacter jejuni/Nanwoodward Peer Review

General info
(Reesegroover)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Reesegroover/Campylobacter jejuni
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Campylobacter jejuni

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Disease, pathogenesis, transmission, and metabolism are good sections to focus on and add to, which helps the overall article communicate clear and thorough information. The changes contribute more information on the progression of the disease and overall rewords/adjusts grammar and tone to be more precise, professional, and scientific. There are many details added through the metabolism section that explains the process very well at the cellular level. I think continuing to add more details is a great strategy, and the changes in tone/grammar help the article a lot and look very good!