User:Reethespiethes/Asylum in the United States/Jennanand Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ruth's Asylum in the United States Contribution


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Reethespiethes/Asylum_in_the_United_States?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Asylum in the United States

Evaluate the drafted changes
When I first reviewed the article, the first component I had looked for is neutrality in the article to make sure the information was not biased. Ruth did a good job of making her information seem factual and neutral and I did not see any bias or certain viewpoint while reading the information that was provided. Also, I noticed most of the information provided did have sources following them which worked and were linked to sources properly. Also, one aspect I did notice that could be changed is on the second and third paragraph for each other their first sentences there can be a citation added since the information provided seems to be factual just for copy right reasons. Besides this small issue, I really liked the in text links I really think that enhanced the article and gave good definitions and made the article seem more formal/advanced. Also, in general I really liked the concepts Ruth included. I think refugees mental health/trauma is a very important topic to be addressed so I think this really helps enhance the article and is something this generation needed to know about so it is good that this is finally included in this article on Wikipedia. Also, I think the heading of sanctuary movement was a good way to add information into the article also and it seems to be pretty recent especially if sanctuaries were prevalent during the Trump administration. The first and last sentence could be cited but besides that I think the content is really good to include in the article and I really liked how some of the information added occurred recently. For grammar, these edits did not seem to have any grammar or spelling mistakes and is very well organized. I really liked these edits and think with a few minor edits it will be even stronger! Great job!