User:ReginaPhalange4/The BBC Advisory Committee on Spoken English/Mazen1991 Peer Review

== . The paper by the BBC advisory committee on spoken English formation aims to help the broadcasters pronounce sound words that were frequently mispronounced. The committee’s founding figure, John, wanted to create a committee that would set standards to ensure that the broadcasters correctly pronounce the words. However, this was not achieved since the committee used the wrong channel to enforce specific pronunciations. This has resulted in uncertainty and inconsistency on what should be regarded as proper pronunciation and appropriate pronunciation within the English language. However, the committee should have involved all stakeholders in setting the threshold on how the pronunciation of these words should be; the stakeholders include the language experts. The paper outlined the findings that were met during the review on the pronunciation. Firstly, the standardization and the regulation of the spoken language is extremely and highly controversial. Secondly, the first two chapters of the recommendation describe the linguistic aspect of its work after it had been taken on the role of standardizing spoken English. There are weaknesses experienced in this study, including the structural crisis that ensued and the changes in exploring why this committee failed to follow the required linguistic policies. This article is essential to individuals who have significant interests in  English language and language policy.The quality of English that would not be laughed at was the accent that Jones referred to as the Public school pronunciation. The committee considered that the PSP would be able to convey a suitable sense of unbias and sobriety in the determination of the proper ways of pronouncing words. ==


 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)