User:Reham321/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Multicultural marketing

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose this article because its something that interests me, its important to my professional and educational line of work, and because it's in need of citations and more development.

Evaluate the article
The article's content is relevant to the topic, but it may not be up to date.

The article could be made more neutral as some of the current language is set to persuade the importance of multicultural market. There is a warning on the top of page: Most facts in the article may be backed up by a reliable source of information, but unfortunately citations are not linked but listed as someone would in an educational paper. However, if the sources could be tracked down, that would be ideal as there is a healthy variety.

There are no images or graphs in the article, which is another gap.

There are no conversations going behind the scenes about how to represent this topic on the talk page. The article is rated as start-class on the quality scale and mid-importance on the importance scale. It is part of the WikiProject Culture. It was mentioned in class that sometimes bots come in and course correct something in the article and will show up on the talk page - which occurred on this article. However, thats the only activity on the current page.

The article's overall status is that it exists but does not currently meet Wikipedia's current editorial standards due to the reasons listed above. The article does contain the backbone of the relevant content and is organized in a way that makes sense. The article can be improved by the following ways: ensuring the content is complete and up to date, drastically neutralizing the tone, and linking citations. I would consider the article's current state to be underdeveloped.