User:Rehlers23/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Medical law

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I was looking up various topics regarding Healthcare Law and came across article and saw it was short and didn't have a lot of information. It also only had a few citations.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead paragraph is concise but is lacking detailed information outlining the topic. Additionally, there is no introduction to the information contained in the article. The content is clearly missing detail overall and does not contain very much information. The tone of the article is neutral. The sources and references are a bit out of date. I think there are better sources out there that could provide a better understanding and be more relevant. The quality of the writing is good and easy to read. Page does not contain any media or images. Article could be improved to contain more information. The article is on wikiprojects list stating that it is stub-class and is of high-mid importance. There is nothing on the talk page except for references to wikiprojects.