User:Reidtosa/Phronima sedentaria/Phnatko Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Reidtosa, Mikehuang99


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Reidtosa/Phronima sedentaria


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Phronima sedentaria

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think the lead gave good background on the organism, and concisely explained what is further described later in the article. Overall, the information in the article and the sources cited seem up to date and relevant, and the edits mentioned in the talk page were made so the sources in general look good. There were some small grammatical changes that I made throughout, but nothing too big: In the "ecology" section, I italicized the three genera mentioned in the very first sentence (Pyrosoma, Doliolum, and Salpa; and I think some people add "sp." after the genus name but I don't think it's required), I changed "periopods" to "pereiopods" since the correct (second version) spelling was used later in the article, and I italicized the "P. sedentaria" in the second to last sentence; in the "life cycle and development" section I just italicized the organism name. A lot of those grammatical changes I noticed had already been edited in the mainspace article, so don't worry if the edits I made were things you had already fixed. The other things I noticed in the mainspace article was the last sentence in the "distribution" section didn't have a citation, and some of the sources have comments "Check date values in...", which looks like a formatting error that you might want to double check. Overall, the article is really well organized and the information is really well-written and explained thoroughly! (The talk page edits/comments I added earlier just weren't the right format for the assignment, so this is kind of an updated version of edits, especially since the few comments from the previous suggestions were fixed)