User:Reina El Homsi/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Business Informatics
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I chose this article because I am a student majoring in business, so I was attracted by the title and curious to learn about business informatics.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes ,it gave a general idea about business informatics.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The Lead is Concise, it gives a lot of information clearly and in a few words; brief but comprehensive

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, it only focuses about this topic.
 * Is the content up-to-date?Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I think what is taught and provided to students of business informatics is missing.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes, it only focuses on providing information without including any opinions.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The Career prospects is underrepresented, it should include more information.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? It is neutral so the purpose is not to persuade but to provide the reader with  information related to business informatics.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, there's a journal and some references.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?Yes
 * Are the sources current? There are some links from 2002 and 2007, as for the journal it is current.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they do work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is very easy to read, clear and brief.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, every section focuses on a particular idea.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? There are no images.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? behind the scenes, there is International Standard which discusses the layers of informatics and there is a modification about external links.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is part of WikiProjects Business and rated as stub-class and low importance.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? An interesting article but needs some improvements.
 * What are the article's strengths? Simple and easy to read.
 * How can the article be improved? Include some images, more details and information about business informatics and should focuses more about the career prospects.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Underdeveloped, it needs a lot of improvements.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: