User:Rejoro323/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Home economics

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because home economics is the history of the foundation of the community's health and wellness. I am a student learning about the foundations of Family and Consumer Sciences and I thought this article would be good to read over.

Evaluate the article
The lead section was concise did not contain any information that it did not represent. The lead section does not include much about what is highlighted, such as all of the country's individual history of home economics. The content written is relevant and up-to-date, but does not include much information about the general topic of home economics. Underrepresented groups are not discussed within the article. The article's tone and balance is neutral and non-biased. It does not persuade the reader in any way. The article's sources and references are diverse and mostly up-to-date. The links work and from what I have seen, they are peer-reviewed articles. The article does show breakdown of each topic with titles to create a well-organized reading. There are pictures that show women in the kitchen, which is historic to home economics. There are also pictures of historic home economic influencers that relate to the topic. Within the comments, many individuals are noting that there is no expansion upon the family and consumer science topic that is mentioned in the article. It is mentioned that the article does not show the importance of home economics. The article has been rated a C-class and is in five wiki projects. Overall, the article's strengths is its cut-and-dry facts about the main topic of home economics. However, the article's weaknesses include the history of home economics and why it is important today. It does not share any current information about how home economics has evolved into a science and study called Family and Consumer Science.