User:Remcelveen/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Robert William II

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it was the article that I was going to be contributing to.

Evaluate the article
Lead

The lead section does include a concise starting sentence that accurately reflects what the topic is about. However, the lead section fails to accurately describe what the article is about. The lead section does not include information that is not included in the article. And it is concise and not overly detailed.

Content

There is a substantial amount of content missing from all the sections. Specifically, a substantial chunk of information from Williams' theories. The topic does deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps as it is addressing an underrepresented population. Specifically, a prominent Black psychologist who revolutionized the field of Black psychology.

Tone and Balance

The tone of the article is balanced and neutral. It is not biased in any perceivable way.

Sources and References

References do not appear to be well sourced. And a citation is missing from the article itself. The majority of the links do function, however, one does not. Additionally, there are likely better sources available than those referenced in the article.

Organization and writing quality

While the article is well organized I believe that the writing quality is lacking and could do with some grammatical alterations and changes to sentence structure.

Overall Impressions

Overall, I believe that the article fails to accurately capture the work that Williams has contributed to the field of psychology. But, the article is well organized.