User:Remsense/NPOV is easily the best way to edit for passionate ideologues

—assuming you are here to build an encyclopedia—if you are an ideologue or otherwise believe strongly in a certain political or social cause, a neutral point of view is easily the best tact to take when editing or discussing the content of articles. If you want to make the world better in the context of a cause you deeply believe in, the best way to help achieve that end on Wikipedia to that end is to write according to WP:NPOV.

It is not reasonable to fully distance one's ideals about the accessibility of high-quality, reliable, verifiable information with other views one may have regarding how the world should be. While Wikipedia is decidedly not an endorsement of a given political system, nor are the ideals of Wikipedia coterminous with those of any particular political project, it is artificial and unhelpful to attempt to wall off one's personal views when editing. Of course, this does not mean letting your views short-circuit you—one can believe strongly in certain things, in a way that does not become a pastiche of a bad-faith political actor, or results in one treating others with less than due respect. Some strong views are ultimately incompatible with being WP:HERE, but an even greater number are not. One can be the strongest advocate of something without being to those around them in their day-to-day lives. Other social situations may be different, but these thoughts apply only to Wikipedia and other comparable venues.

Of course, the avenues for literal, straightforward advocacy on Wikipedia are intentionally extremely limited and controlled. This is to a large degree what makes WP:NPOV possible to begin with.