User:Remus210/Aegae (Macedonia)/Honkshoo The Bird Man Peer Review

Lead: Lets reader know the significance of the topic, I feel like it tells me what I need to know briefly before reading the article. I like the addition of the suffixes; they add a nice piece of Greek language to the article. The lead holds a big chunk of information, I would maybe find more information to put into the other two sections to balance it out some. I feel like the last sentence in the lead section of the original article about the UNESCO list shouldn't be in the lead, it feels weirdly placed and not all that important to include in the lead.

Article Structure: The addition of the "city basics" section is good! It seems as though the original article mainly focuses on Philip's tomb... which isn't what this article should be about necessarily. I think discussing the city itself adds much needed information so well done there! Order of the paragraphs makes sense as well.

Coverage Balance: As I said in the paragraphs below, I think your addition of the "city basics" section is a good idea. Maybe still add some information to the other sections. Otherwise, coverage is good.

Content Neutrality: I don't know how an author of an article can be biased about a city. Looks neutral to me.

Sources: Information is connected to some sort of source! Looks like a lot of the sources from the article are websites which is a little iffy, but I believe all the links work!

Overall, good job. I just see some minor fixes and additions and you should be good to go.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)