User:Ren18838/Game (short film)/Dylanmcallister Peer Review

General info
Renaud St-Pierre
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Ren18838/Game (short film)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The lead is structured concisely and well, however the author could decide to include the year in it. The lead does not include an introduction to the different sections however it is arguable whether it is necessary for a film (However it does include a contents heading).

Content:

The content is all relevant, and the plot summary has enough depth to explain the film whilst also not describing it word for word. Some wording could be changed to be more concise, there is lots of run on sentences. Considering the amount of awards the film won and its thematic relevancy to current social issues I would argue it is worthy of Wikipedia.

Tone and Balance:

Everything is neutral when speaking of the film and its production history. It simply presents the facts behind the film without sharing any opinion or bias.

Sources and References:

After checking the sources it seems they are all generally reputable. The sources are all working and are from a variety of sources, some smaller sites to larger film sites. If more information were to be added I would refer to new sources.

Organization:

The content is generally clear and easy to read, except for a few longer sentences it seems well written.

Overall impressions:

The article seems relatively full given the amount of information about the film on the internet, it could use some pictures however. It seems ready for publication, perhaps all it needs is one more read by the author to ensure full clarity.