User:RenamedUser jaskldjslak901/Archive22

Re: BetaCommand
I don't think he did it on purpose: He removed protection from unprotected user pages too. Might be AWB or something in that vein. User:Logical2uTalk 22:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Too slow for AWB, anyways I think that when a page is unprotected, the talk page also gets unprotected, if it was, but it still gets the message, somekind of wikimedia bug I guess. Jaranda wat's sup 22:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Saul Kaiserman - undelete request
I noticed that you were the editor who deleted 'Saul Kaiserman'. I'd ask that you undelete that bio/article. In support of my request, and in response to the criticisms made of the bio/article's noteworthiness, I am attaching some of my notes and relevant links below.

Saul Kaiserman is a recognized leader in the field of Jewish education, and an opinion leader in the scholarship re: birkat hamazon

Kaiserman's thesis was reprinted on an independent website: www.lookstein.org/resources/birkat_hamazon.pdf

Below is a link curriculum written based upon ideas gleaned from Kaiserman's writings on birkat. http://www.lookstein.org/lessonplans_output.php?id=-1721873

He was an invited/featured speaker at the Limmud 2007 conference on birkat and other topics in education: apps.limmudny.org/lny_2007/limmud_pub_schedule/schedule_v1.pl?op=p&id=409-10k-

On the subject of eating disorders: http://www.atid.org/resources/eating.asp

Of course, there's also the self-published scholarship: http://newjewisheducation.blogspot.com/search/label/environment

On other topics: http://www.shma.com/nov_06/consumers_producers.htm

http://my.mli.org.il/newsletter/NewsLetterHeb_May2006/index_files/%D7%9B%D7%9C%20%D7%94%D7%9B%D7%AA%D7%91%D7%95%D7%AA/Community%20Conference_Program.pdf

http://www.bjeny.org/pdf/shabbatTable/AST/AST-Beshallach-2006.pdf

And he has influenced other scholars: http://urj.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=3503&destination=ShowItem

Thanks for your attention to this matter. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this subject, or want further information to use in re-evaluating the bio/article.

Best regards,

Devin

Devin P. Cohen: Devincohen 05:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC) devincohen@msn.com

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Saul Kaiserman. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

999
999 recently received a short block for harassing Mattisse (block log). "Coincidentally", during this block period, someone created an account Plastic Leprechaun and made an intentional "error" on their second edit to their user page diff attempting to implicate Mattisse in sock-puppetry. They then created and redirected an entry called Plastic Paddyism to Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism, I'm assuming to insult editors who were involved in the Plastic PaddyAfD and the editors involved in the current Starwood Arb where 999 made the comment which got him /her blocked.

"Coincidentally" 999 is the editor who nominated Plastic Paddy for AfD.

I suspect Plastic Leprechaun is a sock puppet of 999 or one of the other parties involved. - WeniWidiWiki 21:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I cross posted this to hopefully get a checkuser here, in case you are out of the office. - WeniWidiWiki 21:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I blocked Plastic indef, i'll wait for the checkuser results to block 999 longer. Jaranda wat's sup 21:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you, for being so prompt. Very aggravating situation. - WeniWidiWiki 21:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of XTRAREWARDS
May i ask you why was the article on XTRAREWARDS deleted? It is not a spam, just like the nectar Loyalty Card (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nectar_loyalty_card), it is a petro - loyalty scheme which is based in India and founded by a FORTUNE 500 company ( Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.)

Plz respond.

They way u were fast in deleting, show same response in replying also! tht wud b great —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vijay.poonia (talk • contribs) 06:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC).

Even if it's not spam, it's a recently released rewards program that isn't really notable. Won't survive an WP:AFD Jaranda wat's sup 07:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. If being recent or old is a criteria thn i can add about XTRAPOWER which is a FLeet Card Program running for last 4 years with 1 million customers in India. Asking u beforehand so that my efforts at writing it dont go waste once it is deleted. Shall i ?????--Vijay.poonia 07:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

If you want do, as for the rewards article, just merge it with the indian oil article, i can restore it and you can place the info there, then I turn it into a redirect, but I'm going to sleep now. Jaranda wat's sup 07:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Ya thats a good idea i guess. Plz restore the article and i will merge it with the Indian Oil article, and on "XTRAREWARDS" search on wikipedia redirect it to Indian Oil Article (IOCL). Thank a lot..have a nice sleep !!!--Vijay.poonia 07:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Is there some reason the Jason Beam article was deleted again? I've been working with the Admin RHawarth to make sure that the proper content gets posted in it. The last communication (yesterday) in the page was that I was asking the admin if the content I have would be appropriate. I had not heard back from her by today, and noticed that the page was deleted. Please advise --Clean391 00:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Dannii Minogue article
Hello. I recently nominated the Dannii Minogue article for FA status. I was wondering if you would be willing to read over the article, correcting its grammar, prose, etc. Thank you very much. -- Underneath-it-All 21:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

My userpage
I would prefer my userpage not be protected, because:


 * 1) I want my page open to everyone to edit, in the wiki spirit ;-)
 * 2) All those IPs are open proxies, and this makes them easy to find. Blocks away!

Prodego talk  03:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Please Dont Delete
first of all i am not the only one creating college football players articles, there are a lot of other people doing it to, and please do not delete the articles i have already created.--Bucs10 03:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Bucs10

Deleted image
Hi, you have deleted this image:, but the same image with the same wrong license re-appeared again in Image:SorayaTarziFace.jpg. Just to let you know. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 09:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * And perhaps you should also look the uploader's contributions in the image namespace. All images (s)he uploaded were tagged as PD-self, but they weren't. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 09:29, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Deleted Page
I've been working with the Admin RHawarth to make sure that the proper content gets posted to the Jason Beam page, and am awaiting a reply to my last query. The last communication (1/25) in the page was that I was asking the admin if the content I have would be appropriate. There are several communications back and forth regarding the information in the article with RHawath I had not heard back from her by today, and noticed that the page was deleted. Please advise --Clean391 15:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

BOT - Regarding your recent protection of Stephen Colbert (character):
You recently protected this page but did not give a protection summary. If this is an actual (not deleted) article, talk, or project page, make sure that it is listed on WP:PP. VoABot will automatically list such protected pages only if there is a summary. Do not remove this notice until a day or so, otherwise it may get reposted. Thanks. VoABot 05:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Realism
You missed that redlink to 'dirrty realism' before protection. :) Carson 06:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Block of User:PopeofPeru
You had forgot to notify the user s/he had been blocked, I went ahead and added the template on the userpage. Somitho 07:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, this user who you indeffed earlier today, has earned himself the dubious fame of being the first Colbert commodity vandal, but he's also an established account with at least a few previous constructive edits and no history of vandalism, so I've unblocked him (on "not punitive", and according to the "ask questions later" part of the "shoot first..." principle). Hope you don't mind. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #9
The February issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 18:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Your RFA
Please answer the questions before listing it. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 20:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * My most sincere apologies, I was typing them ^_^ -- Cat out 22:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey!
Hi, Jaranda! I noticed that you protected the Super Bowl XLI page. I think another admin W.marsh is watching it. I hope you are staying safe in Miami -- with all of that revelry going down there :-) Maybe you can upload some pics of Superbowl stadium after the game (if you don't mind). Real96 23:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

List of The Buzz on Maggie episodes
Could you undelete List of The Buzz on Maggie episodes? I'll remove all the text so that it isn't a copy vio of TV.com. Thanks, Peregrine Fisher 23:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

ITN
Reverted you on ITN since the featured article is so short, so we need the old entries. Cheers, JACO  PLANE  &bull; 2007-02-5 02:12

Itchy fingers
Meh, I'm feeling like it's time to go. We had a chat about you nominating me for adminship a while back - I reckon I'd like to give it a shot. Do you still feel like you'd like to write up a nomination for me? Cheers, Moreschi Deletion! 18:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hey Jaranda,

I just would like to thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 54/13/11. I appreciate the trust expressed by members of the community, and will do my best to uphold it.

Naturally, I am still becoming accustomed to using the new tools, so if you have suggestions or feedback, or need anything please let me know. - Gilliam 20:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject Deletion
You recently joined WP:SCISSORS. As an admin, and one the community has trust and faith in, I would appreciate it if you would ensure we (as a Wikiproject in our actions) are acting in the best interpretation of policies related to deletion. I know there are some people who seem to think we're the Deletionist Cabal (since so many members ARE deletionists) but I'm more concerned with making sure it's done right than just deleting things, and your oversight would be welcome. --Elar a girl  Talk 22:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * And thanks for the nomination. Now, fingers crossed :) Cheers, Moreschi Deletion! 09:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


 * My apologies for closing the RFA early - I'm sorry if I wasted your time - but I was feeling as though that RFA was on the fast track to the graveyard. I guess I'll just have to try again in future, but it's no big deal. Cheers, Moreschi Request a recording? 21:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Cyrus Farivar
It's a misunderstanding of DRV's purpose to insist that any reversals of deletion require recourse to DRV. Slam dunks and clear-cut cases do not, and as Jimbo has previously said, this is a clear cut case where the consensus of AfD, should it opt to delete, is flat-out wrong. Phil Sandifer 01:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I have further elaborated my reasoning as to why this is not a circumstance for review on both DRV and AN. Phil Sandifer 01:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * There is disagreement and agreement with Phil's reasoning. You are invited to comment at Deletion review/Log/2007 February 7.  GRBerry 14:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Not happy
You closed China as an emerging superpower with a 50-50 split in the votes, and discounted keep votes (including mine, which specified a clear rationale) at will so that you could justify deletion. This is outrageous. Everyking 07:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree. The point of an AfD is to determine consensus, not discount other people's opinions because you don't like them. --Hemlock Martinis 07:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * AFD is not a vote, many of them were invalid reasoning, i discounted from both sides by the way Jaranda wat's sup 16:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

DRV
Hi Jaranda -- I disagreed with your treatment of the AfD, and have posted on DRV.

An editor has asked for a deletion review of China as an emerging superpower. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Sdedeo (tips) 08:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

DRV of Vanishing Point (alternate reality game)
Did you discuss with W.marsh before listing at DRV? If the two of you had come to agreement on the close, we could have avoided the discussion. While DRV is available for community input in these cases, we do prefer that people discuss it with the closing admin first. GRBerry 21:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Unusual Revert
Might I inquire as to why you removed my edits from someone else's talk page? My comments there were friendly, and not vandalism.Arcayne 01:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * So I did. Thanks for catching it. I meant to put it on a talk page. Oops. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arcayne (talk • contribs) 02:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC).

Reactions setion to Anna Nicole
I would like for you to restore the reaction section to the Anna Nicole Smith section because I feel as I had explained earlier in the discussion page it is not about a memorial but it is a testament to the views people had of her when she died which is relevant to how she was viewed in life. As someone also previously stated he Steve Irwin has such a section. --Ozgod 12:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Ryan Leaf
I was looking at the article for copyediting, and the main thing I could find was that the referencing is spotty. In numerous instances the reference given does not actually confirm the entirety of the referenced statements.

For example, "In one locker room incident during Leaf's rookie year, he was caught on camera screaming at a reporter "Don't fucking talk to me alright! Knock it off!" and had to be physically restrained by teammate Junior Seau." is only indirectly referred to in the next ref:

"'The next day, Leaf went on an obscenity-laced outburst toward a reporter who had written about an obscenity-laced outburst from Leaf the day before. That videotaped meltdown is still a staple of sports shows.'" Circeus 15:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Extra content comments:
 * I moved the mention of Brady Leaf to the lead. Because the article redirects there, the relation should be made obvious as early as possible. It looks like Brady might get his own article too, so the mention will probably go there anyway.
 * Maybe the bit that used to be in Personal life and legacy could be expanded some? Brady's career seems to have had a few highlights of his own.
 * Also, I think there should be something about how he received the golf coach position because his quarterback coach is a volunteer position, and carthel wanted him to have a paid one.
 * Circeus 16:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I'll try to fix the concerns as soon as possible, first I need to work on another article that strongly needs fixing. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 06:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Obvious sockpuppetry
All you need to do is look at the comments he leaves. The writing style is the same, and he's interested in the same things that his other "cohorts" are. For instance, he somehow stumbled upon a particular administrator's talk page to help out his buddies. Look here. This reversion of Yamla's deletion was something like his fifth or sixth edit. Give me a break. –King Bee (T • C) 23:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you. –King Bee (T • C) 23:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

My talk page
Hi Jaranda,

I'm tiring of this struggle over the Favre page just as much as everyone else, but I don't think it's necessary to remove comments placed by TheQueensHMS on my talk page, as you did here. I'm not sure if it's policy to do so if the user is banned, and if so, fine, but I'm trying to figure out the entire story as objectively as possible and edit warring over my user page makes that difficult. -- PSUMark2006   talk  |  contribs  04:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Banned users = the user is banned from wikipedia and all edits should be reverted if the user is found out to be a banned user rather fast, and all socks blocked in which that was the case here. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 06:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I guess I was just trying to resolve the dispute over the contested information being included on the article rather than the user's behavior, hence my interest in keeping dialogue going. But, at the same time, I understand WP:DENY and WP:BAN and will exercise a bit more discretion in the future when pursuing this sort of mediation. Thanks for stepping in and letting me know. PSUMark2006   talk  |  contribs  15:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

lay-out of your user-page
hi, after I informed you some time ago that I had 'stolen' the layout of your userpage, someone nominated my userpage for the best userpage on nl:wikipedia. I declined and referred them to your userpage. Regards, Aleichem 08:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Starwars1955
I hate to beat a dead horse here, but I notice you ban tagged the userpage and I can't seem to find any discussion where the individual in question was community banned. If this was discussed, could you send me a diff? If it wasn't I think the tag should probably be changed back to an indef and a community ban discussion started on the spiffy new community noticeboard. I think at this point the individual in question is disruptive enough that a Brett Farve topic ban is completely justified. Let me know when you get a chance. Thanks!--Isotope23 14:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I have suggested that Starwars1955 be banned from the community. Please see this discussion. –King Bee (T • C) 16:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Just came to your page by various links (i.e., comments on Wikipedia article)
Hope your mother will get better. Your contributions to Wikipedia are commendable, good job. AppleJuggler 14:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

question about deleted article
I was wondering why the Stanley Graze article was deleted. Looking for information about him, I found a dead link to an article that the deletion log says you deleted. There still is an article about his brother, Gerald Graze, where he is referred to, but I was wondering if there was anything in the original article that would have been useful. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.160.130.12 (talk) 20:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC).

WikiStalking by PageantUpdater
In your edit here, you said, Evrik you are violating WP:POINT by the creation of those stubs, if you keep on creating more stubs I will block you Jaranda wat's sup 05:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC) If you look at the edit histories for You will see that PU had never edited on those pages before. Ever How am I violating WP:POINT by creating stubs? I don't understand how you feel as PU is reverting my edits, I'm violating policy? --evrik (talk) 15:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) The Amazing Race 3
 * 2) The Amazing Race 5
 * 3) The Amazing Race 10
 * 4) The Amazing Race 11
 * Hello? --evrik (talk) 20:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Need third opinion
Would you please take a look at Yellow Submarine Improv Troupe (YSIT)? I am currently in a conflict with User:IrishGuy about this article. (Among others - he has been following me from article to article). In a nutshell: I removed a lot of uncited claims, unencyclopedic and/or vague language, and explanation of improv comedy. He says he disagrees with my removal of what he feels are claims to notability, but which I feel are uncited, vague references to people they hired to teach them. So he just reverts all of my edits, not just what he says he disagrees with.

As I said, this conflict has moved from article to article, as he reverts edits that I make to remove uncited material. Please, if I am doing anything wrong, tell me, but I really don't want to be in an edit war, and certainly not several of them. I am just trying to clean up all of the articles about non-notable comedy groups, and this one in particular has a lot of irrelevant or uncited claims. Thanks, Future Fun Jumper (TIC) 00:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Zzuuzz's RfA
Hey, you stated in your opposition that his answer to Question 2 wasn't good, so I figure I would let you know that he has now expanded on it. Might not be enough to get you support since you cite other reasons for opposing, but just letting you know. (I agree that his first version of Q2 was quite disappointing).-- Wizardman 20:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

More sockpuppets of starwars1955
We just completed a checkuser on starwars1955's multiple identities and turned up 25 additional users - see Requests_for_checkuser. Thanks, PSUMark2006   talk  |  contribs  02:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Footballers who died while playing
You have suggested this article be a candidate for deletion: could we not keep this article as, although there is a category which covers it, it does not provide the details or deaths of said players. GiantSnowman 11:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

VegaDark's Request for Adminship
 

 Thank you for supporting my RfA. It was successful at a unanimous 52/0/0. I hope I can live up to the kind words expressed of me there, and hope to now be more of an asset to the community with access to the tools. Please feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me in the future. Thanks again! VegaDark 07:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Evrik
Would you care to take a look at Requests for comment/Evrik and leave a comment if you feel it is appropriate? Thank you. -- PageantUpdater  •  talk  |  contribs  |  esperanza  23:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject Miami
We can use someone with your knowledge of Miami & Miami-Dade County in Wiki Project: Miami. Would you like to join the cause? Skillz187 18:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Spears current event
No one is explaining their objections to the addition, there are only continual reverts 69.119.239.138 02:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Deletion review of List of fictional beverages
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of fictional beverages. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Nardman1 02:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

RfA
Hello and thanks very much for the kind words. I'm kind of interested, but I don't have the time at the moment to do much admin stuff. I should be writing articles! I'm thinking that I'll give RfA a go later in the year. Best wishes, Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:29, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Leprechauns in popular culture
I'm wondering in your close of this, if you ignored the count, or if you didn't, how you counted things. By my count, there were 4 deletes, 2 keeps, and 1 "no merge" !vote. One person said to either "keep" or "delete, no merge" ... which I would simply count as an opinion against merging. Did you see things differently? Mango juice talk 19:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I saw 3 keeps and 3 deletes, with another delete obviously discounted, i didn't see both sides peruading enough so no consensus, the article isn't so good though and I'll re AFD in a few months if it doesn't improve 19:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Leeds_United_A.F.C.
Thanks for protecting the page, that was getting really tiresome. EliminatorJR 22:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Request For Undeletion
You are the editor that deleted "Lush For Life". I can see no reason why this article was deleted, as it is, indeed, a newspaper just as worthy as inclusion as "Creative Loafing", or any other free alternative publication.

I am sure that it must have been a mistake, and I ask that you please review the article for reinsertion.

If I have misunderstood and there are legitimate reasons for its deletion, I would be ever-grateful for your reasoning.

Thank You.

Casey Kent —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JerryAttrick (talk • contribs) 05:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC).

Thanks
Thanks for watching out for my user page. --Nlu (talk) 05:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Bernard Corpuz article....
Why did you delete "Bernard Corpuz?" The soldier killed in Afghanistan.--MonkBirdDuke 09:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedians born in 1989
Hi Jaranda, I notice you undeleted Category:Wikipedians born in 1989. I'd recently started a WP:DRV discussion to review 1ne's decision to delete the category. If you would like to comment in the discussion its happening here. WjBscribe 04:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)