User:RenamedUser jaskldjslak901/Archive27

Deletion of Ankhet
Can you please tell me why this was deleted other than "Blatant Advertising"? It was an unfinished copy of something that would help out all the new players joining Ankhet. It was not meant to be advertising. I'm open to any suggestions on how to edit it so it isn't considered Blatant Advertising. I'm not sure if the signing thing will work, but this is Jumsy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jumsy (talk • contribs).

Wikipedia is not the place for people to join your game clans, see WP:NOT, and WP:N Jaranda wat's sup 20:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * What is the definition of Blatant advertising? How come other games (ie. Pyroto Mountain, or MapleStory, or any of the other online games) have articles then (especially since Ankhet is from the same creators of Pyroto.) 203.59.100.103 09:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

It's not meant for that at all, but if you don't have any suggestions on how I could edit it to meet wiki's standards, is there still away I could reclaim it and move it to a different place such as wikibooks. The first link you sent me says that it is a place for game guides.

Jumsy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jumsy (talk • contribs).

I don't know if wikibooks may accept that info though, it won't meet wikipedia standards, if you need the info, I could always email to you, you need to have your email enabled though. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 21:13, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

I have my e-mail written in my profile, and I assume that as admin you have access to it. I don't want to print it here, so let me know if you can see it.

Jumsy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jumsy (talk • contribs).

Deletion of My Enemy, My Ally by Diane Duane
This article was deleted without discussion. The only notation is that "Wikipedia is not a plot summary." While the plot summary was the only part of the article submitted so far (and not labelled or even complete at the time) the novel is one of many by that author, some of which have articles and some of which do not. Can that article be undeleted and the "Plot Summary" header added to the part that was there? And so this doesn't happen with the other three titles in that miniseries of Star Trek novels by this author, is there a formatting requirement list that should be used?

TravellerDMT-07 14:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

It was tagged for WP:PROD and I deleted per the user reason, contested prod have to undelete, likely placing it in WP:AFD though. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 14:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, not sure what all this means("user reason"? WP:AFD points to the definition page...), still can't find article to complete it if it was truly undeleted. The page on Diane Duane (the book's author) has a link for this title (and others) that should point to the entry for that book, but it points nowhere. 98.194.89.153 05:25, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Cavalier (band)
Hi could you give me my code which you so kindly deleted.

Thanks P Cavalierband 21:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Windward Studios page
I would like to know why the Windward Studios page was deleted. This company has produced open source software, all of which is now freely available. Timelines for company history were given, references from many verified sources on the web were given. This article was also edited and modified by many users. I logged in today and was about to edit some changes I saw that were not relevant posted by another user when I noticed the page was deleted without warning. I believe WP rules stated that you must post to a page that is has been marked for deletion before it is deleted.

--DonnieF 13:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

See WP:CORP Jaranda wat's sup 19:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of usertalk page
Why did you delete JzG's entire user talk page? --Android Mouse 22:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

I didn't, I only deleted a strange welcome message after he deleted it. Jaranda wat's sup 00:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I was only looking at the most recent deletion and didn't see he had deleted it right before you. --Android Mouse 00:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Tyrannosaurus in popular culture. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:39, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Nightmare Beauty
Excuse me, but I am just enquiring as to WHY Nightmare Beauty's and Kriss' page is being deleted. please explain how I can stop this from occuring as the band (Nightmare Beauty) is a certified band that plays in Australian towns local to their location.

I have tried everything I can think of to stop this from occuring, but i have failed everytime.

Kriss

See WP:MUSIC Jaranda wat's sup 14:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

confused
hi, im new to wikipedia and was creating an article on a song, yet you athoritively deleted it. i am confused and would like to understand why it was deleted. a response would be well appriciated. ~mouchman

I saw the cleanup, June 2007 tag, which seems to me as a recreation of an article that was deleted before, also indiviual songs aren't notable unless they charted and lyrics are copyrighted. Jaranda wat's sup 16:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Hip Hop Healthy Coalition
You all are really starting to get on my nerves. If you can read then you'll see the significance of this entry. The Hip Hop Healthy Coalition is dedicated to promoting positive health messages to young people through the use of Hip Hop. That is self explanatory. Maybe you can't relate, which is not my problem, but there is no need to continue to delete my posting because you're not relating. This is plain outrageous. What is not significant about my posting. I will be waiting on your response.

See WP:N Jaranda wat's sup 22:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Tay Zonday
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Tay Zonday. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. DES (talk) 17:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of articles?
Can administrators delete articles if an AfD debate is already open? I ask you because one) I'm curious, and two) the article List of Los Angeles Dodgers Opening Day Starting Lineups is copyvio, which I just noted after nominating the article for AfD, and the creator of the article,, denies that it is. The AfD debate is here. Ksy92003 (talk)  23:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

I just voted strong delete in that article, as I noticed it in the AFD page, let it run it's course as it will likely get deleted sooner or later, Spanneraol reason is moot there. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 23:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I noticed that... you had just commented there right as I was preparing to post my comment here; otherwise, I probably wouldn't have left you the comment. We'll have to see what happens.  Sorry for the "eventually unnecessary" comment here, Jaranda :)  Ksy92003  (talk)  23:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

An unrelated comment, but when looking at AfD discussions, do you take the nominator's rationale into account when deciding to delete an article (if that's what's necessary)? Ksy92003 (talk)  23:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

SPAN page creation.
ChipMD and I are trying to establish a page for the Students Peace Action Network. It seems that during construction of this page you sponsored a speedy deletion of our work. Please cease this activity immediately. We are working to establish a page which applies itself fully with the wikipedia template and the premature deletion of our work will undermine the establishment of an informational document.

Please understand that I have read the CSD A7 notification and that this organization of political activists may not be arbitrarily categorized as "unremarkable" without an actual discussion.

Deleted Student Peace Action Network Article
It seems you've deleted the article on the Student Peace Action Network (SPAN) twice. The first time seemed justifiable since I had prematurely clicked the save button and only the title appeared on the page. However, before I could edit the page (we are talking five minutes here) you deleted. That seems pretty quick, but still fair. However, the second time you deleted the page was not just at all. As state in the article SPAN is a national organization with over 130 affiliates and chapters. That makes one of the largest if not the largest student peace group in the country. Another student based antiwar organization, Campus Antiwar Network, has had a long standing article. A long standing that has several problems and has been tagged for needing to be fixed. However, it has not been deleted as it has been establish CAN is significant. Now I question how one could argue any national organization, paticulary one as large as SPAN, is insignificant. If you had a problem with the article I wish you would of posted it in the talk page or given the article a chance I'm sure it could of been worked out. Instead of trying to find a solution or work out a problem in a reasonable amount of time you just deleted the page. I take serious issue with that and would like to try to resolve this issue.

Reprotect Pony
Please restore the permanent semi-protection you removed on Pony. Just see the edit history since you unprotected it. I have no clue why this article is hit constantly, but it is. Montanabw (talk) 21:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't see that much vandalism, only hit a couple of times since I unprotected it. Semi-protection is mainly for uncontroliable vandalism. and other issues like BLP. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 21:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Finger Jousting
I was wondering why you chose to close the AfD on the Finger Jousting page ([]) with delete when there was an ongoing debate and the consensus at that point seemed to be going towards keep. The reasons you gave would seem to be appropriate as part of the AdF debate (which you did not contribute to) but I thought that the result of these things was meant to be based on the consensus of the community rather than the opinion of one editor (you). Guest9999 22:21, 10 August 2007 (UTC)]]

Alice Chantrey
I'm sure you're aware that you recently failed Alice Chantrey as a good article candidate. Since then I have made a few changes based on your suggestions in the talk page, I would just like to know your current opinion on the page and what may be done to further enhance the content of the article. Thanks AiselneDrossel 12:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Louis Amundson deleted
I just noticed that an article on NBA player Louis Amundson was deleted without any discussion, or even a notice at WikiProject National Basketball Association. Amundson did play 11 games in the NBA last season, and there's long precedent for keeping articles on any MLB, NBA, NFL, or NHL players. (You probably know that, since I've seen you participate in discussions like this.) You may not agree with the guidelines on athletes, but at least have the courtesy to tell someone when you're planning to delete articles like these. Zagalejo 18:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

I thought he was only a D league player, sorry about that. Jaranda wat's sup 18:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. Zagalejo 18:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

LA Dodgers opening day roster AfD
How much longer have we got to wait before the debate is closed for the List of Los Angeles Dodgers Opening Day Starting Lineups‎ AfD? Ksy92003 (talk)  23:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

It should be closing in the next few days. Jaranda wat's sup 22:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Ksy92003 (talk)  22:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion Review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Finger jousting. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Guest9999 02:58, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Mole Listening Perals
Just as I added proof of notability to Talk:Mole Listening Pearls, the article was deleted. Can you restore the article please? Thank you. —Christopher Mann McKaytalk 22:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Sean Ellis deleted
There is a reference to Sean Ellis on the movie Cashback's page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cashback_%28film%29.

He is an established Photographer (search Google for extensive entries) and is now branching into film. He has been nominated for an Academy Award. Could you restore his page? Thanks.

Don Beyer Volvo speedy deletion
Hi. I am Journalist1983. Yesterday you deleted Don Beyer Volvo (as well as Land Rover Alexandria). Based on my reading, I believe that it's possible you violated WP policy, in that if a speedy review is contested (it was), and if the subject matter isn't controversial and the article not nonsense (they weren't), then you're not supposed to delete the article without a discussion.

The article was extremely well sourced (review my work -- I over-source, if anything). It was extremely well written; there was no nonsense in it (I have a journalism degree and am a professional writer). I agree that the issue of whether it was truly "notable" could be a point of discussion, a discussion in which I am willing to engage. But there was not any blatant advertising (the WP article was substantially toned down from the sourced articles from respected newspapers such as the Washington Post and others; this is a really cool auto dealership with years of local and international do-good works associated with it).

Moreover, given that there are other car dealerships in WP (see Category:Auto dealerships), most of which -- in any objective view -- are not any more notable than Don Beyer Volvo, I think you erred by not permitting a discussion. WP states when NOT to use speedy deletion:


 * Sometimes speedy deletion criteria are applied to articles that they do not and were not intended to apply to; also, rules that are not speedy deletion rules are often mistakenly used to justify speedy deletion. This section aims to clarify some of the frequently used "non-criteria" that are commonly cited but are not sufficient, by themselves, to justify speedy deletion. These are not rules and intended only to be commonly understood interpretations of the criteria above.


 * Non-notable subjects with their importance asserted: Articles that have obviously non-notable subjects are still not eligible for speedy deletion unless the article "does not assert the importance or significance of its subject". If the article gives a claim that might be construed as making the subject notable, it should be taken to a wider forum. [emphasis added] However, articles with only a statement like "This guy was like so friggin' notable!" can be deleted for lacking context, because it gives no context about the subject.

(See Criteria for speedy deletion)

A claim of notability had been made, both on the discussion page and on the talk page of the editor who placed the speedy deletion tag. The article was not controversial or nonsense. I respectfully ask that you place the article back and permit the discussion to ensue. Thank you. Journalist1983 13:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * You know, between this editor's wikilawyering and the articles he's created -- an odd, fully formed assortment which includes 3 auto dealerships commonly owned (Beyer Subaru, Don Beyer Volvo, and Land Rover Alexandria); a Washington political fundraiser's bio (complete with GFDL-compliant portrait); a Mississippi businessman; and a Nebraska university official and the company he runs, I'm getting a distinct feeling that either he's edited here before under a couple of different names or that he's emulating a certain someone's business model. --Calton | Talk 16:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I appreciate you can pick and choose -- I have edited hundreds of articles, some more than others. WP states that you should not engage in personal attacks, which you have clearly done above.  I am new to WP (as of March 07 anyway) and admit I am still learning.  I have had no other screen names.  Please stick to the content and refrain from attacks.  Kind regards, Journalist1983 16:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

See WP:CORP, I speedied another car dealership in the category, and the rest are notable chains. Jaranda wat's sup 19:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Also curious about Windward Studios
Hi;

I am curious as to why Windward Studios is deleted but pages like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InetSoft_Style_Report, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actuate, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Builders, and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microstrategy are acceptable.

I do not understand what it is missing from the Windward Reports site compared to these. I would just like to know what the difference is.

thanks - dave

re:Copyedit
Hey. Sorry for the late reply; unfortunately, I've been pretty busy wrapping up old priorities, so I might not be able to get to it. &mdash; Deckiller 02:32, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Page User:Tecmobowl
Was his status changed from indef blocked to banned?  Citi Cat   ♫ 13:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Jmfangio
This user has repeatedly been harassing me, following me around, reverting my edits I make to my own talk page, citing guidelines for why he did it. I opened a discussion with him, politely asking how I am violating the policies he claims I am, because I wasn't familiar with any of them. But when I asked him, he refused to answer, then archived the discussion. I then made an edit to a user subpage which he continues to blank. He's been completely harassing me for the past three days, and he knows it is annoying me; he said he doesn't care at all, yet he continues to answer any of my questions. I know about harassing, because that's what I was blocked for, and now he's doing it to me on my own user talk page. Ksy92003 (talk)  05:15, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Also relevant, Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. – Luna Santin  (talk) 06:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Ken Hubbs
Hi Jaranda. Are you able to do th necesary imporvements for this GAC?  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 08:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Not soon as I'm in vacation, you could fail it for now. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 19:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Hazarth Syed Ahmed Basha Qadri of Banaganapalli
Hi,

May I know the reason why the page was deleted ?

Ashfaq

Triad High School
Can you please tell me why our page, Triad High School (Troy, IL), was deleted? I realize that this page means absolutely nothing to you, and you probably don't care much, but a new student at our school may find this interesting. Not to mention friends of mine who don't go to school with me. It took my friend and I sometime to create that page seeing as we're new to wikipedia and we found it very rude that you deleted it. If you're going to delete ours, why not delete the other Triad High School page, and also Calallen High School. They obviously are of as little importance as our high school.

Deletion Review 2
An editor has asked for a deletion review of David Shafer (baseball player). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Sasha Callahan 11:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I was actually surprised that it was you who closed it as delete when there was clearly no consensus, and when there is no consensus, the general choice is keep... see Articles for deletion/List of Los Angeles Dodgers Opening Day Starting Lineups; there was No consensus, so the article was kept. Ksy92003  (talk)  18:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm likely going to contest the result in DRV, that should have been deleted looking at the agruements, and there was 12 delete votes and 6 keeps, one was by the article creator, and two it's obvious WP:USEFUL. Jaranda wat's sup 18:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Wait... do you mean the result of the David Shafer AfD or the LA Dodgers Opening Day Starting lineup AfD? I'm a bit confused... sorry.  Ksy92003  (talk)  18:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

The LA dodgers one, it seems like it was closed as no consensus as it was too long Jaranda wat's sup 18:54, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Ah, okay. I wanted to open up the DRV but I don't know how, and I already mentioned the copyvio to WP:CP; I don't know what happened with that.  But if/once you open the DRV for the LA Dodgers roster article, could you let me know?  I already know I'm gonna want to contest the decision.  Ksy92003  (talk)  19:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Already did. Jaranda wat's sup 19:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks; I'll voice my opinion soon. Ksy92003  (talk)  19:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I noticed you used the wrong template on the article page. The one you inserted reads "This page was deleted from Wikipedia...," which obviously is wrong; the article still exists. I don't know what the right template is, but based on the first six words, this doesn't seem to be the right template. Ksy92003 (talk)  19:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Random Smile For Ya


WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. -WarthogDemon 18:54, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Dean confers notability?
Is there a policy or precident on this? Seems to me that that are so many non-notable deans in the world. Anyway, the ball is in your court on Afd (or lack thereof). I don't know if the former dean was notable, but it seemed to me that not all deans were notable. Spa toss 20:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Notability (academics) Jaranda wat's sup 20:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Acount creation
Okay I know this was a while ago but I made my acount 6 months before you made that.--HBKH 17:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)HBKH

Battle of the Boulevard
I noticed you had placed a "prod" template on Battle of the Boulevard indicating it was non-notable college rivalry. It was deleted 5 days later with no discussion. Within the article I never found the link which for discussion (both pros and cons) which is usually associated with articles which are nominated for deletion. I'm just wondering why it was deleted without any discussion whatsoever about the notability of the article in question. -Ichabod 23:49, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Prod is seperate WP:AFD, AFD is for discussion. Jaranda wat's sup 23:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Inappropriate speedy deletion
List of volcanoes in the Republic of Macedonia should not have been deleted as it was part of a global system. The global list and Category:Lists of volcanoes are now incomplete and cannot be used to find out the names of the volcanoes in Macedonia, of which there is evidently at least one. Could you please restore the article and allow a proper discussion to take place? I have had no prior involvement in this issue, but your haste was unseemly. Postlebury 09:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

It's a valid A1 Info was

This is a list of active and extinct volcanoes.

a small chart of

Name Elevation Location Last eruption meters feet Coordinates Duvalo - - - -

nothing else. Jaranda wat's sup 17:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Capital IQ- Review Requested
Hi, I was hoping that you could provide me with some insight into why this article was deleted. I understand the policy quoted in the edit summary, but the decision to delete appears to have been made without any discussion with or notification to interested editors to allow them the opportunity to address the concern.

The article was on my watchlist and I did not see a "prod" or a similar improvement template. After a quick search I also could not find any AfD discussion. Finally, I recall that the Talk page for the article included notes from several editors stating their belief that the company was notable (I know that this in itself is not enough to establish notability, but should have demonstrated that deletion of this article would be controversial and therefore additional discussion would have been appropriate).

If I've missed the discussion on deletion of this article please point me in that direction, otherwise I respectfully request that you consider undeleting the article and adding a relevant improvement tag so that myself and other interested editors can address the notability concern. Many thanks. Richc80 11:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Calton tagged it for a CSD as the company didn't claim notabilty. Jaranda wat's sup 17:28, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the information, but it just seems to confirm my thought that a proper discussion did not take place prior to deletion. The rule referenced in your deletion edit summary (CSD A7 (Corp)) states "If controversial, or if there has been a previous deletion discussion that resulted in the article being kept, list the article at Articles for deletion instead.".  As I mentioned above, the Talk page for this article contained statements from multiple users indicating their belief that the company was notable, which I think would be enough to demonstrate that its deletion could be controversial.  As such, I again respectfully request that you undelete the article.  If you want to then list it at AfD so be it, but at least it would give myself and other editors time to address the notability concern.  Many thanks.  Richc80 20:49, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion Review for Capital IQ
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Capital IQ. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Richc80 04:26, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

List of chefs DRV
An editor has asked for a deletion review of list of chefs. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Kappa 12:55, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Windward Studios page
Hi;

I'm asking again why did you delete the Windward Studios page? If this helps, I responded to the comments by the person who marked it for deletion here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DavidThi808#Can_you_re-look_at_it_please.3F

thanks - dave

See above, WP:CORP Jaranda wat's sup 17:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

3rr
Why was the other user not blocked also. I have provided that "person" with reasons and proof of why I think the edits he makes are incorrect. He has not provided any compelling argument on his, my or the title in questions talk page. This is extremely unjust. It doesnt seem to matter what the edit war is as much as who the person in question is.Dohanlon

Happy First Edit Day
 ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:16, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * FROM YOUR FRIEND:

Deletion of XM500
The deletion log for this article says it was speedied for "CSD G11: Blatant Advertising". How can it be "advertising" of a gun that isn't on the market and seems to have a good chance of never actually being offerred? 71.203.209.0 09:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

You are not an expert on European football
It is best not to pontificate on matters of which you have no knowledge. There are hundreds of professional football clubs in Europe. This is is a simple matter of fact, and is not debatable. England alone has about one hundred. Brandon97 13:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

DRV of Ironton Tanks
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ironton Tanks. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --  Jreferee  (Talk) 15:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Athletes
I have to agree with you that knew policies are needed concerning the notability of athletes. Maybe a page listing the new guidelines could be created (think WP:ATHLETE), where we determine the notability guidelines for athletes of every sport. This is especially important when it comes to US collegiate athletes, US minor league athletes, lower-tier soccer players, international basektball players and the like.  Sasha Callahan   21:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion Review on LA Dodgers lineups
The deletion review on this disputed article resulted in a relist, and is currently under its second AfD debate: Articles for deletion/List of Los Angeles Dodgers Opening Day Starting Lineups (second nomination). I know this isn't the result you were hoping nor expecting, but it's better than nothing I suppose. Feel free to restate your opinion at the AfD page again. Ksy92003 (talk)  01:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

RFArb on JMF and Chrisjnelson
I made a point of clarification under your statement there. You might want to look at my response and respond there. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 06:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

The notice on your user page
Best of luck, and could I suggest that you do not attempt to request desysopping, unless you have reason to believe that your account might become compromised, and that if you do request desysopping for that reason, you simply ask for your tools back on your return. I'm sure I'd be happy to support you in another RfA, but I think the community would resent the waste of time, and would feel that you were just looking for a pat on the back, and you might end up with an unsuccessful RfA as a result. We do support you, but we don't necessarily appreciate being asked to demonstrate our support when it should be just taken for granted. That's just a gentle hint. If you weren't thinking of it, I apologise for the suggestion! I hope all goes well for you, and hope to see you back as soon as possible, without damage to your real life commitments. Cheers. ElinorD (talk) 20:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Of course I'm not doing it again, I barely passed that RFA, I'm editing until Monday, and then I'll be on once in a while (but not every day or even week), mainly NP patrol which of course tools are needed. Jaranda wat's sup 20:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Everett Public Library
Why did you delete the Everett Public Library page?

See WP:N, libraries are considered non-notable and this one has no claim of notabilty see also WP:CSD Jaranda wat's sup 20:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

LAMPS
Hi Jaranda, i'm wondering why you deleted the newly re-instated entry on the LAMPS. here's my conversation with John Reaves, who previously deleted it:



Fullmetaljacuzzi 18:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

See WP:MUSIC, and needs the reliable sources as well. The band site isn't a reliable source, Jaranda wat's sup 18:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Per WP:MUSIC, they have two releases on a big independent label, In The Red Records. Their band page on the labels website is here, their catalogue for sale is here. What else? Fullmetaljacuzzi 21:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

The label is a red link, and the label website isn't a WP:RS, if I see something like a allmusic link, than I'll undelete and place it on WP:AFD Jaranda wat's sup 21:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Check now. and what can be a reliable source to prove that a band has substantial releases on the leading garage punk label BESIDES the actual website of said record label? Record reviews? what? Fullmetaljacuzzi 21:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

done. I don't understand why it would be placed on AFD though. I've essentially proved that this band exists in a bigger capacity then your typical backyard jamboree bar band that plays covers for beer. Fullmetaljacuzzi 21:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Ok I'm undeleting, but don't create articles on the band members, thanks Jaranda wat's sup 21:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

I wasn't planning on it. Fullmetaljacuzzi 21:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Yea I said that as I normally see stubs of band members that I'm tired of deleting, I normally warn people about that when they create a band article. Doesn't really affect you. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 21:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Harvard University
I am trying to revert vandalism on Harvard University but the spam protection filter is preventing me from reverting vandalism. Are you able to do it, since you are an admin? NHRHS2010 Talk  18:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. NHRHS2010  Talk  18:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yet ran into another spam protection filter while reverting vandalism on Mike Bacsik. NHRHS2010  Talk  18:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)