User:Rezter/Archive4

Re: Tattered
I don't think a paragraph for each song, but I think a few senteces on each are a possibility. It would be good if we could figure out a way to divide them up into two or three paragraphs based on something. Heavy and light songs? Or just go in order? I don't think length'll be a problem most FA album articles have are longer than Vol. 3.  Black  ngold29   15:09, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree. Sounds good. I won't be able to write for a few hours, but if you want to start it I can come in and try to finish it off. If you don't have time now, then I'll try to get it started later. We don't have a deadline or anything!  Black  ngold29   15:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah I saw the DYK, I didn't know it had that many hits though, that's awesome! I've had the List of Awards FLC page on my watchlist, but you've taken care of everything so far, I'll do what I can if anything else pops up. I was gonna work on AHIG last week and then I got busy and forgot about it, is it alright if I keep that in your sandbox while you're away? I'm sure I'll get around to it eventually and hopefully that one can get up to an FA. Oh, and I just realized we forgot to do an August newsletter. Maybe we could put a September one together over real quick here. Remember these days? ha, Overall, I think Slipknot is now one of the best covered bands on WP. In only a few months we've gotten all the albums (and "demos" lol) up to GA or FA status; and by doing that I think we've kind of completed "phase I" of WP:SLIP; awesome.  Black  ngold29   02:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * So what all has happend? Two months, dang. User:Blackngold29/Sandbox  Black  ngold29   02:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The two sections look cool. I guess we could work on expanding the Reception, there are quite a few reviews in the infobox and only about four are in the prose. Oh, and maybe we could throw another picture in there somewhere, we have quite a few on the Commons now and I expect more from the upcoming tour.  Black  ngold29   12:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think the Reception is the only section that needs any major expansion. Then we should be able to give the whole thing a few proof-read throughs and it should be good. Sorry about the late reply...school.  Black  ngold29   15:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That would be fine. I've got a big paper due for school tomorrow, but perhaps later in the week I should be able to start it up. It shouldn't take too long. Is it alright if I use your sandbox?  Black  ngold29   15:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses)
I have added you as a co-nominator. Cheers! Gary King ( talk ) 22:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

GA review comments
Hello I left some comments at the Talk:Anita Mui/GA1. Was someone supposed to come by again? Benjwong (talk) 19:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review anyhow. Benjwong (talk) 00:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Vol 3
The image was only a "Special edition cover". Usually, allowable alternate images are those of deluxe editions. The image fails to comply WP:NFCC. Sorry for the unspecific edit summary but that is usually my summaries. --Efe (talk) 13:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Its up to you buddy. But for me, as you've said "of sort", it fails under WP:NFCC. People in the FAC room will question the fair use of this image. --Efe (talk) 13:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Its up to you. But I remain negative about that image. I'll put it back. --Efe (talk) 13:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Joey Jordison
I put the page up for Good Article Nomination at WP:Good article nominations. I know you contributed to it a lot, so i thought you would like to know. Hopefully it will pass ! Jakisbak (talk) 13:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

9.0: Live
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/9.0: Live Gary King ( talk ) 20:44, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Renominated Gary King ( talk ) 20:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Personnel

 * Say please, and I might consider listening next time. Jasca Ducato (talk) 17:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: RATM awards?
It looks like it's been marked as promoted now :) Gary King ( talk ) 21:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)