User:Rezwanas/Butter cookie/Kahmilmo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Rezwana


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Rezwanas/Butter cookie - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Butter cookie - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead seemed to not have a lot of information before. In fact, there was only two sentences, so this was a good article to revise. The information added is relevant and neutral. Rezwana isn't leaning in a certain direction. The information is clear and easy to understand. The sources used are properly cited, some are recent, and some are more from the 1900's because they mention the history of these cookies. To add more you could mention if the recipe is easy to make especially since it is an older recipe. A butter cookie seems like a fairly easy recipe. You mention that this is a Christmas cookie, but it is already mentioned in the paragraph before.