User:Rf091/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Jahai people
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I have chosen to evaluate this article because there is not a lot of information on it.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes, I think it clearly mentions the Jahai people.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No, the lead has no mention of the sections and has no other information about the article.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, because there is not any information in the lead.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? No, if anything it is under detailed because it has very little information.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? yes, the information is about the Jahai people, there just is not a lot of information.
 * Is the content up-to-date? I would say yes most of the references are from 2017-2019.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is a lot of information missing. one of the main things I would like to add is their history and everyday life,
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes, there does not seem to be any opinion in the article.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, it just gives facts about the Jahai.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current? yes, most are from the past few years.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes,

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? No, it is very underwritten, it needs more information about the Jahai people.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? No, there are no major topics and no headings.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, there are only two picture in the whole article.
 * Are images well-captioned? yes, they describe what the pictures are.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No, i do not see a citation for them.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No, they are not near the information being talked about.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? I think it is a stub.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? The article needs some work. it is very short and underdeveloped.
 * What are the article's strengths? It has a good beginning sentence, and a few resources.
 * How can the article be improved? it can be better organized (headings, major topics), and there can be more information and details added.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? The article is very underdeveloped, there is so much missing information.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: