User:Rgill73/Nymphaea tetragona/Ggill05 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Rgill73


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Rgill73/Nymphaea tetragona, there is nothing there, so I reviewed the original article, thinking they added to that directly.
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nymphaea tetragona

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead section is present, it tells us the topic of the article without the reader having to go through the entire article, and it also gives a brief description of each major section of the article to summarize what the article is about.

Content: The content is relevant to the topic and up to date, but there is just so much of it all grouped together. I did not see anything in your sandbox, so I went directly to the article and peer-reviewed that. I think that you can add some other relevant sections like morphology, etymology, maybe some medicinal uses.

Tone and Balance: The content add is neutral, and there is no first-person tone used for any of the information provided. When reading through it appears to be fairly balanced article, with no biases or the article leaning more towards one viewpoint.

Sources and References: Most of the sources don't seem to be journal articles, most of them appear to be links to online websites. I cannot tell if the sources are recent or not, but they seemed to be retrieved in January/February 2022, so I am not sure which sources you added.

Organization: As mentioned before, it does look a bit disorganized, not it terms of the heading and sub-headings, but the amount of information all crammed into one paragraph. It will help if the content is a bit more spread out. As I was reading the article, there were a couple of spelling/grammar errors, so that should be looked over.

Images and Media: There are no images in you sandbox, and only one is the species box, so I would recommend adding some to allow for a better understanding by connecting the words to visuals.

Overall Impression: I think that this article needs some work, it terms of adding more details to the species Nymphaea tetragona, I have mentioned what types of things you can add are above in the content section.