User:Rgree1/sandbox

Article Evaluation
"A Rose for Emily"
 * Overall all the information is relevant to the story.
 * The page is overall neutral, it gave many ideas within each section and it did not really skew one way or the other.
 * I think the idea of insanity and if Emily truly was is underrepresented.
 * In the structure section I think the fact that the story was split up by Roman numerals is something important to look at.
 * The cites all work and seem relevant to the topic at hand. All the sources somehow reference the story.
 * I think the page needs more sources; there were entire sections that didn't have any citations.
 * The citations that are there are reliable.
 * The page is rated start/low so there is definitely room for improvement.
 * On the talk page for this story there seems to be a lot of arguing over what can and can not be said and the validity of some people's statements.
 * Homer's sexuality is talked a lot about but no one really has any reliable sources to back up either claim.
 * The talk page brings up more points and ideas than we ever discussed in class.