User:Rhizzus/Hashtag activism/Lifelonglearnerlifelong Peer Review

General info
I will be peer reviewing Rhizzus' draft on "Hashtag Activism."
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Rhizzus/Hashtag activism
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Hashtag activism

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Wikipedia has flagged this Hashtag Activism article as possibly too long in length, and I certainly agree with this statement. However, it does seem that Rhizzus' suggestion to add a sub-section that discusses Black Women's Rights would be a valuable contribution. Perhaps the other subsections could be edited to contain fewer examples. While there isn't necessarily content that is not appropriate for this article, it seems that there is just an abundance of content.The current sub-sections titled race, women's rights, awareness, political, trends, and LGBT rights contain a large number of examples. Perhaps editing down each section to only include three or fewer hashtags could free up some space for the new "Black Women's Rights" section. Adding this section provides to opportunity to include more up-to-date information related to hashtag activism. Some hashtag examples, like those listed under the LGBT section, are severely underdeveloped. Because the article is already flagged for being on the longer side, I would recommend removing the developed sections rather than adding more content.

While some of the hashtags discussed in this article are not politically neutral, the article does a good job keeping a neutral tone and not sharing a bias toward a particular position. The information contained in this article seems to remain informative rather than attempting to persuade a reader.

It may be valuable to add images to more of the hashtags shared throughout the article. An idea would be to have at least two images under each sub-section.

Overall, the article seems to be in need of content narrowing. Addition of a "Black Women's Rights" section would be valuable, but it seems wise to remove other information as well. At the minimum, I suggest to remove the following hashtag examples: #PublishingPaidMe, #EndFathersDay, #Girlslikeus, #DidnidadLiteraria, #Ownvoices, and #Transfake. These are simply too underdeveloped to be included at the moment. Great work, and I am excited to see where this article is headed.