User:Rhya Evans/Women's reproductive health in the United States/Rani110 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kmg121, ReedNatalie, Rhya Evans, and Sophianunn


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:ReedNatalie/sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Women's reproductive health in the United States

Evaluate the drafted changes
The draft is really informative, you all did a great job!

The edits help make the "Lead" section more concise and gives an overview of the article, you could perhaps mention the racial disparities here that you all touch on later in the article and switch the order of the two sentences you all have now.

You all use reliable and updated sources to back up your points, and the links in your "Reference" section work. The article is organized really well.

The different models you all mention in the "Fertility Awareness Based Models" section is helpful, maybe mentioning technological ways to track a cycle (like apps) could be added?

The discussion in the "Assisted Reproductive Technology" is informative, are there other forms besides IVF that could be talked about here?

The last two sentences in the "Assisted Reproductive Technology" section could be moved to the "Race and Reproductive Health" section. The analysis of racial disparities in this section is great, I'm wondering if there are other identity group based disparities that could be touched on in the article

Overall, you all added some really helpful context and examples to this page!

Rani110 (talk) 22:11, 10 April 2021 (UTC)