User:Riananjara/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

 * Name of article:Bourgeoisie
 * This article is closely related to the recent subject of marxism in my class and I wanted to see a neutral historical description of "Bourgeoisie"..

Lead evaluation
There are 3 different definitions of it which can make it confusion at first but they all basically say the same thing. There are brief descriptions of the article's major sections


 * Content evaluation
 * Most information is relevant to bourgeoisie. They also mention other uses of it or other versions that may have been used in discourse throughout the world. content was last edited September 16.

Tone and balance evaluation
Majority of the information is historical and descriptive. there is a wide range of material going from films, to art, to culture, which is important for this type of article

Organization evaluation
it could be better organized id say. it is odd to me that the biggest sections after the list of different Bourgeoisie is the Nazism section.

Images and media evaluation & Sources and references evaluation
Yes with 38 total sources, majority of them are credible and books by prominent historians and authors. Majority of it are secondary sources though.

Talk page evaluation
Some would say that the article gives the hint that Bourgeoisie means upper class and not middle class. its implied to be that way in the US however. perhaps the article may need to specify this case.

Overall evaluation
Overall the article is descriptive and has good definitions but some who are stingy about the specifics of whether Bourgeoisie refers to the middle or upper class may have some issues with the definitions.

~