User:Ricardiana/GA template

Criterion 1: well-written
(a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.[1]

Criterion 2: factually accurate and verifiable
(a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout; (b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons;[2] and (c) it contains no original research.

Criterion 3: broad in its coverage
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;[3] and (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Criterion 4: neutral
it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.

Criterion 5: stable
it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.[4]

Criterion 6: illustrated, if possible, by images
(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.[6]