User:Rich Farmbrough/temp91

Temp 90

 * Raw


 * Preprocessor node count: 480782/1000000
 * Post-expand include size: 2048000/2048000 bytes
 * Template argument size: 917027/2048000 bytes
 * Expensive parser function count: 0/500


 * Cut down substring lengths
 * Preprocessor node count: 480784/1000000
 * Post-expand include size: 2048000/2048000 bytes
 * Template argument size: 913941/2048000 bytes XXX save .3 % ???
 * Expensive parser function count: 0/500


 * Use a core
 * Preprocessor node count: 480782/1000000
 * Post-expand include size: 2048000/2048000 bytes
 * Template argument size: 917027/2048000 bytes XXX back to previous...
 * Expensive parser function count: 0/500


 * Hypothesis - the saved calls are relatively cheap. The cost is all from the "find". Therefore the process till bombs out on call 88. Seems unlikely but nothing else makes sense yet, apart form ascribing near-supernatural optimisation powers to the parser - which would mean we had no problems anyway.