User:Richter Hero

I very much appreciate constructive criticism, no matter how trifling the matter. If I've done anything wrong, or if there's some nuance that I'm missing, please let me know.

I've almost finished working on a template (and Lua module) to format linguistic interlinear glosses, which should hopefully be ready not long after I get back to finishing it – that should be before the end of the year.

Random thoughts
There is a certain class of articles about "easy" topics that attract a lot of (often minor) editing by users who aren't always aware of the limitations of their competence. Such articles deteriorate over time. When to avoid making an edit: if your edit summary is longer than the change in the text if your talk-page comment is shorter than the wiki markup of your signature. The more time I spend on wikipedia, the greater proportion of that time is taken up by undoing various sorts of biased, ill-informed, vandalous or plain silly edits. In the mythological world of Wikipedia there's one evil force which is feared as much as sorcery was during the Middle Ages: sockery The joy in editing wikipedia is inversely correlated with the size of your watchlist. I'm reading through WP:NLT#Rationale for the policy and I can't help thinking that the prescribed policy of banning on sight does in some cases have the effect of undermining its principles. In a discussion, the more thoroughly you present your argument, the less likely are participants to read it. Corollary 1: detailed proposals tend to receive a greater number of ill-informed votes. Corollary 2: the longer the discussion, the less likely is the closer to have read it all.