User:RickSwordfire17/Juba Peace Agreement/Wagz22 Peer Review

General info
RickSwordfire17
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Juba Peace Agreement

Evaluate the drafted changes
The original article talking about the Juba Peace Agreement is incredibly simple and talks about general information. I really like the plan to make the article more in depth on the information provided in your sources. Specifically talking about the global impact of the peace agreement is a fantastic idea. The original article just tells you that the UN supported Sudan but doesn't go in depth at all. This is a super important topic that you could totally delve into and unwrap. Yes the UN obviously supported Sudan in the midst of the crisis, but how did other surrounding countries respond? Why did the UN respond the way it did and were there any European countries that didn't want to support the country?

I also really like the Updates section of your table of contents. You mentioned you added it because the peace agreement was signed so recently and I think that is a great plan. The crisis in Sudan is obviously ongoing and talking about what is happening in the country now, and partially why the peace agreement isn't really working could be really interesting. I almost think having a pros and cons of the agreement would be a nice addition. Not in the sense of like "why is the peace agreement good" because that would be a really obvious answer, but coming from the perspective of the fact that it isn't really working, you could talk about why it isn't.