User:RicoCorinth/sandbox/HOA

My justification for insisting that my point of view be included, and that Jance's not be presented as "the truth"
From Five_pillars:

"Wikipedia has a neutral point of view, which means we strive for articles that advocate no single point of view. Sometimes this requires representing multiple points of view; presenting each point of view accurately; providing context for any given point of view, so that readers understand whose view the point represents; and presenting no one point of view as 'the truth' or 'the best view'. It means citing verifiable, authoritative sources whenever possible, especially on controversial topics. ..."

What Jance Did
Jance postulates that the governing documents are private contracts. She cited no sources/references.

The way I left the article
[The way I left it]