User:Rieboom/Leptospirillum ferriphilum/Chrisp01 Peer Review

General info
Rieboom
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Rieboom/Leptospirillum ferriphilum
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) Introduction (Lead): The introduction provides a concise overview of Leptospirillum ferriphilum, its characteristics, and its ecological significance. It introduces the reader to the topic effectively.
 * 2) Scientific Classification: The scientific classification section is clear and well-structured, providing information about the bacterium's taxonomic hierarchy. However, it might be helpful to add a brief explanation of the different taxonomic ranks and their significance.
 * 3) Citations: The article includes citations to support the statements made.
 * 4) Taxonomy: The taxonomy section provides essential information about the bacterium's place in the biological classification. It's well-written and informative. However, it would be beneficial to include some information about when and where it was first discovered or described.
 * 5) Ecology: The section on ecology is informative and highlights the ecological significance of Leptospirillum ferriphilum. The reference to the Rio Tinto river in Spain and its impact is relevant and helps readers understand its role in real-world environments.
 * 6) Biomining: The section on biomining is informative and describes how Leptospirillum ferriphilum is used in industrial processes. The mention of temperature and pH ranges is useful, but it might be helpful to provide citations for the studies mentioned to support the claims.