User:Rileeeee ;D/Leslie Ewing/Niapiamia Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Rileeeee ;D)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Rileeeee ;D/Leslie Ewing

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? There still needs to be additional content and information added to the rest of the article that is present in the Lead.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is well written; concise and informative.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? The content added is relevant to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Some information is up-to-date, like her current profession and the organizations she is a part of.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is some content that still needs to be included.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? The content added is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Everything on the article at the moment is neutral and well represented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? The professional content is backed by Ewing's LinkedIn profile that is used as a source.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, it is updated by the subject herself.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? The LinkedIn link does work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No. Only parts where there needs to be information added.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No.
 * Are images well-captioned? There is not an image added.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? There is not an image added.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? There is not an image added.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? There still needs to be a couple of sources added to the article.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? There still needs to be a couple of sources added to the article.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes it does, the info box on the right includes important biographical information and the introduction is well written.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? No.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The article does seem more complete with the new information added.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The professional section as there is a lot of information on the subject's LinkedIn profile.
 * How can the content added be improved? Just to include the rest of the information.