User:RileySchill4/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Imperial Roof Decoration:Imperial roof decoration
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?   The article's content is relevant to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally? It is written in a neutral tone with no biases
 * Does each claim have a citation? There are no citations within the article; all of the claims are unsupported by links
 * Are the citations reliable? N/A
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? The Article does tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too. There is some minor contribution, but nothing significant.
 * Sources:
 * Sources:

Option 2

 * Article title:Metopes:Metope:Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? The content within the article is relative to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally? Yes, the article is written neutrally with no bias
 * Does each claim have a citation? Not every claim has a citation
 * Are the citations reliable? Most of the citations that are included are reliable, but not all of them are.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? I do not believe so
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too. There is one comment on the talk page, but no ongoing conversations.
 * Sources:
 * Sources:

Option 3

 * Article title:Villa Cornaro :Villa Cornaro
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? The articles content is relevant and wholly about the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally? It is written mostly neutrally. There seems to be some positive bias in the descriptive language.
 * Does each claim have a citation? While most facts are backed with citation, it doesn't seem that all are.
 * Are the citations reliable? The citations come from good and reliable sources.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? The article does not cover the equity gap.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too. There is some talk on the page about times its been modified in the past.


 * Sources:

Option 4

 * Article title:
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.


 * Sources:

Option 5

 * Article title:
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.


 * Sources: