User:Rileycurrey/sandbox

Article Evaluation

In the article on the Ancient Agora of Athens, there is strictly information having to do with the subject of the article, no distractors. Since the article is about central, public place, there isn't much room for bias. One thing I would critique is the summary of it, I feel that it should be a bit more in detail of what the Agora was used for and what went on there. As far as the sources, there is only a direct link to once of them. So that is definitely something that should be fixed. However, the one link that works seems to be neutral and a solid source. In the talk section, there were two people who updated external links and another who made some suggestions for the article content. This wikipedia article is very well ranked and is a part of three wikiprojects. In the wikipedia article, the content is more summarized and then goes into further detail rather than discussing it in detail from the beginning.