User:Rishikeshan/Public domain-copy

BSD or Public Domain for upcoming edits
Sir,

I am Rishikeshan. I like Wikipedia. Will you please convert Wikipedia to public domain? Please do it, sir. I know you can't convert wikipedia completely to public domain, but you can make upcoming edits of Wikipedia and other projects under public domain

The reasons why release in public domain are:

1.In public domain Authors can get use of it and it will be the most open content.

This helps book writers, Other writers of digital method and they can adopt according to their needs. PLEASE! HELP AUTHORS AND PROPRIETARY CONTENT WRITERS. COPY-LEFT IS USEFUL TO SOFTWARES BUT CONTENT MUST NOT BE IN COPY-LEFT. PROPRIETARY IS NEEDED TO THE WORLD. Eg:- Linux grow because of competition with Microsoft and BSD.

2.No one can be competitor of Wikipedia, even if you make Wikipedia public domain, because Wikipedia is the largest and the most trusted.

3.Please remember no one is going to write derivatives of Wikipedia because it is too large. But, authors are going to make derivatives of pages of Wikipedia.

4.Even If you make new content of Wikipedia under public domain, Wikipedia will not loose People's trust.

5.Please understand no one can compete Wikipedia even if Wikipedia is not copy-left.

Wikipedia can live MORE USEFULLY if it is under public domain. Please remember BSD as an example. BSD criticizes GPL and GNU but it is favorite OS of many users. Google chrome and chromium project live--better than copy-left-ed Mozilla Firefox and the server giants APACHE and ISC BIND live better than others.

Please make new edits under public domain.

Let's make Wikipedia more useful.

I asked info-en of Wikipedia about this. They said to start a village pump thread.

I hope you will accept upcoming edits under Public Domain.

Please change 'You irrevocably agree to release your contributions under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL.' to 'You accept to give this edit and your previous edits under Public Domain'. If you are unsure, Please make a poll with describing these reasons. Rishikeshan (talk) 03:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Rishikeshan

Most community writers prefer attribution rather than share-alike.

Modified bsd-4-clause license makes attribution

Let's be good people and let's allow derivatives. Making Wikipedia Public Domain Will not affect Wikipedia. Please make Wikipedia Public domain. Public Domain is Helpful to all. I think wikipedians are good-hearted and not selfish. Wikipedians prefer attribution rather than share alike. Any admins interested please talk at user_talk:Rishikeshan Living a competition-less life is waste. Did proprietary contents do BAD to Wikipedia? Proprietary is needed to the world, because copy-left may affect future of IT industry and derivative. This includes there will be economic loss in some countries. BSD IS THE RESCUER TO OSS, BUT WHO WILL RESCUE WIKIPEDIA? PROPRIETARY INFLUENCE SOME COUNTRIES' ECONOMY! PROPRIETARY IS NEEDED TO TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. You may think this is irrelevant, please think a moment. THIS IS THE TRUTH! Rishikeshan (talk) 05:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Rishikeshan There are no problems to Wikipedia by using a modified 4-clause BSD license. Book writers can write books under proprietary, meanwhile preserving attribution.

Please make Wikipedia permissive

original previous discussion: [] Please don't use selfish licenses like copy-left (my opinion) Please help writers and proprietary -- THEY ARE NEEDED TO THE WORLD So, Let's allow modification in proprietary, under attribution, rather than share-alike Modified BSD 4-clause license is suitable license to Wikipedia.

I could not sleep yesterday, because of this problem, Please Help Me! --Rishikeshan (talk) 05:42, 4 September 2010 (UTC)Rishikeshan