User:Riveraaa!/Chicana feminism/Certs02 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Riveraaa!


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riveraaa!/Chicana_feminism?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chicana feminism

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead


 * Just minor edits, additional sentences and suggestions on some paragraphs, and it was suggested to remove two paragraphs from a sections

Content


 * Yes the content added is relevant and up-to-date. Everything is placed where it needs to be. The origin of the movement is brought up with events throughout time that involved this topic and the women who had to face the challenges during those times.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? The content added to me feels like the editor stands on a certain side.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There are claims that are biased to a particular position because the editor wants us to know how serious this topic is with adding more words to convey their feelings.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Not that I see, but I really like how we are told what's going on at a certain time and the struggles these women are facing and how it is being overcomed.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? The content added is trying to persuade the reader in favor of one position.

Source and References


 * No sources added, just edits.

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes very easy to follow.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? None that I see.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Content added should be more separated and should have the section where you are editing from so it is easier to find in the article.

Images and Media


 * None

Overall Impressions


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Really solid, it adds more to how serious this topic is.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The strength of this article is that it is clear of the position it takes.
 * How can the content added be improved? If you are planning to add information from other websites add a reference in the bibliography, and to cite if you plan to use it.