User:Rizing153rose/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Art history

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it was an article related to the course. This article is useful to me because it gave me a brief description of art history.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations?
 * What else could be improved?

Even though this article was useful for the understanding of art history, I noticed large gaps in equity. This article was clearly published to address artistry from a European perspective, and didn't really address how other cultures really contributed to early art history. I would like to know how this discipline has evolved from other perspectives as well.

The links did work. After checking the talk page, I noticed that the article had a B-class rating, but was ranked highly important and had a C-class quality scale rating. This article was part of a wiki education foundation supported project in 2018 and 2021.

~