User:Rjbamber/sandbox

Second Sandbox for WGST3991: User:Rjbamber/sandboxwgst3991

Cardiovascular Health and Panic Attacks
People who have been diagnosed with panic disorder have approximately double the risk of coronary heart disease. Certain stress responses to depression also have been shown to increase the risk and those diagnosed with both depression and panic disorder are nearly three times more at risk. (2005)

A study done two years later (2007) found that older women who have experienced at least one panic attack in their lives may be at risk of a heart attack and/or a stroke. Although there is proof that panic attacks and heart disease are correlated, the link between the two “remains controversial” and the causal hypothesis is still missing (2007) (2014). In a study of men and women who had coronary heart disease, those who had panic disorder were up to 36% more at risk of a heart attack and up to 47% at a higher risk of heart disease. (2007).

( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24923348 ). https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/09/050924105015.htm?utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=ScienceDaily_TMD_1&utm_source=TMD

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/295664.php?utm_source=TrendMD&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Medical_News_Today_TrendMD_1

Sexuality
Within a 2005 study by Cochran and Mays, they reported that, in addition to depression, which is over 17% higher in homosexual men than men in general, they are also more likely to have panic attacks. A large UK-based survey of psychological well-being from 2004 verified that there was also an increased risk for depression and mental distress among lesbians as well. From this data, it is advisable for medical professionals to screen their gay and lesbian patients for depression and mental distress after gaining a valuable rapport.

( http://www.clinicalcorrelations.org/?p=4630 ). https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/151/5/516/117264

Treatment Resistant
Regardless of immense availability of various treatments (as outlined above), there is still a large number of people with panic disorder – roughly one-third – that are treatment-resistant. These patients continue to have panic attacks and various other panic disorder symptoms after receiving treatment.

( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26635099 ).

Notes For Peer Review

 * A lead section that is easy to understand
 * A clear structure
 * Balanced coverage
 * Neutral content
 * Reliable sources
 * 1) First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
 * 2) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * 3) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 4) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!

What I Wrote on Jergal18's Sandbox Talk Page
"'I think these are some great sources to work with for this article. I think having a few more alternative treatments would help cover this section thoroughly as I am sure there are many different ways to deal with perfectionism. From the sources you do have so far, I think it is important to have studies that check back to see if the treatment was successful, it is great to see you have that within them. My article will be focusing on panic attacks, so I think we could both learn from each other: maybe you could look into how panic attacks play a role in the negative affects of perfectionism, while I will definitely look into how perfectionism can lead to a panic attack. Thanks.'"

Panic Attack (Panic attack)
This article is already pretty lengthy and well done, but I believe there are some interesting topics that have yet to be discussed. Chest pain is mentioned, but there is no evidence provided surrounding the possibility of them being related or causal of each other one way or another (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24923348). Another topic missing from the wikipedia article on panic attacks is the relation to sexuality, such as gay or lesbian (http://www.clinicalcorrelations.org/?p=4630). Lastly, there is a large number of people with panic disorder - approximately one-third - that are treatment-resistant, and there is no mention of this phenomenon within the article (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26635099). I hope bringing these new sources to the table can possibly help a few more people, such as even myself, understand panic attacks.

Notes For Adding to Article
https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/courses/Mount_Allison_University/Personality_(Winter_2018)

"My mother was my age, 38, when she published her book in 1968. I was two years old.

She died of bone cancer April 24, 1970."

PSYC-2701: Neuroticism

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Almost everything seemed relevant, the thing that really jumped out to me was the research done on people with high or low neuroticism and why they were chosen to be put here.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article seems pretty neutral, but again, there may be bias as the studies put here are very selective and lead to questions.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * I think this article did a very good job especially within the last section on age, gender, etc. There were many minorities writing about minorities cited, but it was strange to me that although there were so many sources, the section was only one paragraph.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The citations I tried all work, the sources support the claims of the articles from what I can tell.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * From what I could see, all the facts seemed to be backed up and within the talk section, there was a lot of controversy over a lot of this article being removed due to things not being supported by references.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Most of the sources were very recent, and the older ones were only around 20 years old.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * The Talk page of this article was basically just all the issues the article used to have. Maybe it used to be a huge article, but due to the lack of sources and support, it is truly lacking.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * The article was given a C, although it is of high importance. It is part of the WikiProject Psychology.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * This article really breaks the topic down into small sections with little info included. Our class was very interactive learning about this, discussing it along with other personality traits, and taking a personality test ourselves.