User:Rjcam2/P2RX4/Pumwi23 Peer Review

General info
Rjcam2
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

P2RX4
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Rjcam2/P2RX4
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
You didn't add any leads to the beginning of the article. The current lead is a short paragraph that describes the topic. The lead could be improved to touch on the major sections of the article.

You did great adding information about the P2X receptor structure and the functionality of said receptors. You also did a great job maintaining a neutral tone. Both of your hyperlinks to your sources work great, and they also are very informative. You do a good job of summarizing and avoiding plagiarism of the sources. The sources seem very through and details. They are current (7 years ago max) and seem very well written and thorough. In addition to journals, I would also recommend finding additional sources from PubMed or other online databases.

The added content is clear, especially in the sense that it adds headings to paragraphs which makes the following information very clear. I didn't see any grammatical or spelling errors.

I didn't see any images included. Perhaps a good place to start on that would be the structures of the P2X1-7 receptors.

You did a good job here and fleshed out the article. I would try to add a little more to the article, just touching up information here and there. Perhaps make the Receptor structure and kinetics paragraph into two.