User:Rkitam/Miye Matsukata/56ap12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Rkitam


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Miye Matsukata
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Lead is clear enough to deliver the brief introduction of the article.
 * The content is relevant to the topic and is up-to-date in regard to the era of the artist.
 * Tone is neutral and is not biased overall.
 * Various sources and references such as books, newspapers, and articles are used properly, and links work well.
 * Image of the artist helps understanding of the topic and draws attention to the article. It would be nice to add a brief caption of the image.
 * The organization is neat and concise.
 * Overall, the article looks pretty complete and strong.