User:Rklawton/Archive 2


 * User Page
 * Talk Page
 * Archives Index

User collaboration sorted by user name:

User:61.1.233.245
I got a message from you assuming I did some editing on daVinci code. But I haven't yet edited that page. Then why such a message? I thing u are mistaken.. 61.1.233.245 15:07, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Here's the link to the SPAM entry. You'll see that it comes from your IP address.  It's entirely possible you are using a dynamic IP address, one that your Internet service provider assigns to dial-up users as needed.  In such cases, someone else may have made the entry using the same IP address.  You can avoid this problem by creating your own account and password here at Wikipedia.  It's easy, it's free, and you won't have to worry about annoying messages left as a result of someone else's work.  Rklawton 16:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

User:A. B.
Re: Your comment to new user CJC47 last month

I saw on User talk:CJC47 what you wrote after he added a vanity article about himself when he was just starting out:
 * "It may look like you're off to a bumpy start, but don't worry about that. I got first involved with Wikipedia when I unsuccessfully attempted to prove to one of my students that Wikipedia was an unreliable media. My contributions have been more useful since then. Folks here can be pretty patient and understanding. Rklawton 21:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)"

Thank you -- this was a thoughtful thing to do. We need more of this on Wikipedia when new users make misguided, but good faith, edits early on. So often someone bats them down tactlessly and with little coaching after a mistake. I think you'll be pleased to know that he's been a good contributor since then, with over 250 edits in his history -- perhaps thanks in part to your encouragement. --A. B. 15:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * That's great to hear on both accounts. Thank you for brightening my day!  Rklawton 17:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Bot Message
This seems really silly, but could you give me the diff of the message in question? I just combed my bot's contribs and could not find your page. I'm sure it's there...but I can't find it. alpha Chimp laudare 02:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * First off, all the bot is doing is subst'ing per WP:SUBST. All of the templates are added by other users... (I'm sure you've heard this all before, so I won't belabor it). That being said (that my bot isn't warning anybody and the substance or validity of the warnings don't matter to my bot), I'll express my opinion in regard to what you're saying. I could be wrong, but I'm fairly certain I'm getting this right:
 * It's never appropriate to remove a speedy delete tag, unless you're an admin. Simply removing it is vandalism. Truth be told, I've probably gotten at least 10-20 users blocked for this type of activity. As for the hangon procedure, the proper technique is to append the hangon (typically after the speedy, but it doesn't really matter) and then type a message on the talk page. Here comes my big point of disagreement with what you're saying: administrators visit pages nominated for speedy deletion to determine whether or not to delete them. When you append the speedy delete template ( is a very popular one), it lists the article in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. Admins go through that category to review arguments and delete articles. If an article is removed from that category (by removing the tag), there is no record of a speedy deletion nom ever taking place.
 * Also, you might be mixing speedy with prod. Prod is a proposed deletion and you can remove that tag...then go to afd. Speedy relies on WP:CSD, which are pretty rigid. I hope that helps. alpha Chimp  laudare 02:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah! I see about the bot.  Thanks for taking the time to answer my questions.  In further checking, I see we're both sort of right.  Here's what one of the tags says:  If this page obviously does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself.  It's the "yourself" part I'd forgotten about.  At any rate, I'm wiser now, and I appreciate your assistance!  Rklawton 03:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

9/11 Vandal
Just to tell you, per your comment here, he has been blocked. That account will never be back. I certainly hope that his head is spinning. =). Regards, alpha Chimp  laudare 02:09, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Amir85
Re: Happy New Year

Thanks for your support and your diligent copy editing. Har Roozetan Norouz, Norouzetan Pirooz هر روزتا ن نوروز, نوروزتان پيروز ! Amir85 13:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Happy new year to you, too! I enjoy reading your work.  Please call on me again any time to help.  Rklawton 18:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

your recent reversion
"rv edits by someone trying to get a grip"

I chuckled. Humor in edit summaries is always appreciated. Thanks, and cheers! :) --Ashenai 15:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Adminship and you?
Hey... any particular reason you're not an admin yet? If not, and if you'd be interested, I'd consider it an honor to formally nominate you.

Anyway, if you'd like me to, just say the word (and then allow me 24 hours' notice to brush up on everything so I don't botch up the nomination). Cheers! --Ashenai 08:17, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * That's very nice of you to offer. I think we should wait until I can go a whole month without ticking someone off, first.  Rklawton 08:21, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Heh, sure thing. Anyway, my offer stands, indefinitely. Unless you start vandalizing or something. :) --Ashenai 08:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

User:Bearly541
Re: Doog

Thanks!!--Bearly541 22:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * He's created seven of these today, and they're all copyvios. Speedy is just the thing for copyvios.  I've tagged them all.  Cheers!  Rklawton 00:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Bellbird
Re: Sockpuppets

Dear Rklawton -

as it happens, I do not have a single sockpuppet. I do not know the identity of the editor who intervened during the weekend. I believe JoshuaZ asked for a check on this matter - please ask him whether he has been able to confirm that I am using a single user name.

Also - care to read my comment on Tyrenius's page? Bellbird 16:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Benji64
Re: not vandalism

thank you for the effort lawton, but it was unnecessary. what i did was not vandalism. the user happens to be a friend of mine and the fruit-fucker (which is what the picture is of) happens to be a sort of inside joke (if you read penny arcade, which you should, you would know what i was talking about). anyways, id appreciate it if you didnt baselessly accuse me of vandalism. thanks! Benji64 03:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC) youll notice that my version has now been reverted to by the user. please dont think of me as a vandal because im not, and i dont want to be thought of as one. happy editing. Benji64 03:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * My concern that your edits constituted vandalism was far from baseless. Any reasonable person reading your edits to his site would arrive at the same conclusion.  It appears one other editor did.  However, I am quite happy to stand corrected.  Rklawton 07:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Bookofsecrets
Re: Thanks for you assistance

I don't think the Rjenson person is going to let up. Do you? I trying to keep negative bias from that article and others that I happen to run across. --Bookofsecrets 07:39, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

User:Boromadloon
Re: Blocked user Please would you unblock

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Boromadloon

for reasons specified on the profile. I admit I was responsible for some, but I have changed that now, and now make much more constructive posts, such as my addition to the "Billingham Synthonia" pages.

User:CJC47
Thanks for the guidance CJC47 20:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Other leading edgers
Great points about the military being another leading edge technology adapter. Hadn't thought about it, probably because I was an 11 Bravo and the extent of my brush with technology was my good old M-203. I didn't realize that RFID inventory management was a DOD initiative. I'll start digging around and see what other good stuff came out of there. Thanks for the lead. Coolmojito 18:32, 27 February 2006 (PST)
 * Up until last summer, I taught MIS and related courses at Western Illinois University, so give me a heads up what technology areas interest you. The great thing about professin' is all the reading time I got - contributed to a couple of textbooks, too.  Rklawton 20:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Impressive background. I'd love to take you up on your offer.  Right now, am involved with four consulting projects so will wait on asking you until I have time to surface.  Coolmojito 23:15, 9 March 2006 (PST)

Thanks also
You were the first person I interacted with on Wikipedia and were gracious enough to admit that the rv you did was incorrect. That let me know I was going to like this community. Looks like I'm here to stay.

Btw, I'm also a former Army guy. 10th Mountain Division. Used to watch you Airborne guys in Jump School at Fort Benning. Coolmojito 04:49 26 February 2006 (PST)

User:Dppowell
Re: Which vs. that

"That" is restrictive and "which" is non-restrictive. "That" is used to present information necessary to clarify the subject: "I want the shirt that is blue." "Which" provides additional information that's not strictly necessary to get the idea across: "I want the blue shirt, which is next to the red shirt." If there are two blue shirts, I need to use "that" to specify which one I'm talking about: "I want the blue shirt that's next to the green shirt." "After Burns left Blue's Clues in 2002, he recorded a rock album, Songs for Dustmites, that was released in 2003." "That" is incorrect here. There's only one rock album; the one recorded after Burns left Blue's Clues. The fact that it was released in 2003 is interesting and pertinent, but not grammatically necessary. That makes it a "which" clause, i.e. it is providing extra information.

See: Strunk & White, The Elements of Style, 4th ed. p. 59 or the style manual of your choosing. Most/all of them will confirm this usage. I've restored the correction to the article. Dppowell 05:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I tend to follow the Microsoft Grammar Checker; that which generally suggests using "that" in most cases. Thanks for the heads-up, though.  Rklawton 13:35, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the recent vandalism on my userpage :). Fabricationary 17:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Fearisstrong
Re: Band

They actually got a google hit? Whoa that's impressive. --Fearisstrong 03:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Georgia guy
Re: Only warning template

What do you subst to produce the "This is the only warning you receive" template you put in someone's user talk page?? Georgia guy 01:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome
You're welcome, Gwernol 01:05, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

User:'sed
Thanks for the help with this guy. Much appreciated. Gwernol 20:26, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm making new article
I'm making the new article Charles A. Lindbergh's Famous Flight. I already went to sandbox. And i'm adding to it, so (if there is any nicer way to say it) please do not change anything. Thank you. User: Himanyo


 * "jhhjgh" does not constitute an article. I suggest writing the article first, adding it to wikipedia and THEN adding a link within the main article.  You seem to have done things backwards.  Rklawton 19:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

new article
Going to add more and the references after i finish the article. fine i'll make it in the sandbox then send it. Anyways I want to make a new article.

User:Hkelkar
Re: Indian Buddhist Movement and user Hkelkar

This person is reverting the changes without discussions. Also attacks others by branding everybody as anti-Hindu. He also blocked me by playing tricks and giving half-truth proofs. Please read Tom Harrison Talk Page. Bodhidhamma is my brother is USA but still he has branded in a case ==Sockpuppetry case== !! Can you help? Dhammafriend 21:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

User:King Hildebrand
Re: Thanks for saying hello! Your greeting came as quite a surprise! I've been tinkering with pages on Wikipedia for some four months now, and nobody has noticed my existence. (Some have noticed my edits, I confess.) If some blunder of mine has drawn attention, please let me know. I admit to being curious about how it is that someone has contacted me after all this time. I expect I'll be around for a while. --King Hildebrand 19:09, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

wtf?
how the hell is it nonsense? its a real site. (by User:Malik1)

Thats why it was in popular culture DUHHH (by User:Malik1)

Wont link to my name
whats going on it doesnt link to my name! and how do I add a message to a topic already started? Malik1 15:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Just use the 4 tildes - everything's automatic after that. You don't have to type in your name at all.  Rklawton 15:15, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Was getting mad
But you're a cool dude and I appreciate your help. I was just mad my additions were deleted :/ Malik1 15:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC) Malik1


 * No worries. I know just how it feels.  Stop by any time you need a hand or have a question about something.  Rklawton 15:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Merryhobby
Thanks for translation. You missed this bit: ""Daraufhin wurde er von der DGHS gefeuert". Is the text directed at us, or a quote from somewhere else? Tyrenius 01:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

I've mailed you. Tyrenius 01:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied via e-mail. CYA tomorrow.  Rklawton 04:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Nickieee
Re: How can you tell how many pages link to a webpage?

In regards to a comment you posted, can you tell how many pages link to a webpage? Thanks. Nickieee 19:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Pinots
''If this guy isn't a MM sock, then he's his twin in violating policy: User talk:Pinots. Rklawton 21:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)''


 * Probably someone else based on the articles. I'll keep an eye open. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c)  21:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Well Fabricationary and I already cleared that up
As you can tell I am new to wiki and did not realise you were not allowed to ad "non significant" dates to the calander. That being said your comment was not need on this because it was not wanted nor needed since Fabricationary and I already worked it out and the issue did not concern you in the first place. Implying that I am a disruptive users because I am new to a site and do not know all the ends and outs of it is rude and inconsiderate. We were all newbies at one time so please think about what you type before you submit. Thank you, Planb11

Thank you for your message...
Thanks for getting back to me. I first like to apologize if I came off uncivil because that was not my intent. I would just like you to know that this uncivility goes both ways. The way you worded your message made it sound like you were implying that I am a disruptive user whitch is rude. I am not trying to be disruptive. I am new and just trying to learn so I can help constructivly. Well I hope you get the chance to read this and can get back to me. Planb11

User:Ravedave
Hi Dave and thanks for the information. As you might have guessed, I'm a frequent visitor and new contributor. I'm keeping track of my contributions, and I'll do what I can to go back and conform my articles to standards as I get the hang of things.

I'm a photographer, so my primary contribution will be images. In some cases, I have images for articles that haven't yet been written. For example, I have photos of critters that have no matching article yet. As a result, I'm creating an article stub, providing illustrations, and hoping someone will follow behind me and fill in the academic stuff. Of course, I'm making sure that each article is linked from a proper parent, but I haven't got then hang of categories yet...

I'm also a skydiver, so I'm going to re-work the skydiving articles over time. Skydiving should have hundreds of related articles including rigging, competition, dropzones, world records, and biographies. It's the off-season now, so why not?

Like you, I'm also a software developer, business analyst, and project manager. I also enjoy traveling and have visited dozens of countries - including your favorite: Costa Rica. I watched Arenal erupt my first night in country. Very cool.

Lastly, you look familiar. Do I know you?


 * No problem, you are actually the 1st person I have welcomed who has actually stuck around and kept editing. If you have any Qs feel free to ask, I check my talk page every day. You can always use the 'user contributions' link on the left to see what you have edited. Good photographers are always welcome at wikipeida, your lizard pictures are great. I'll check your contriubtions occasionally to see if there is anythign I can add to the articles, but a stub with a picture is a great way to start an article. If possible try and include one wiki-link and a category if possible. Good luck on the parachuting area, hopefully you can clean it up enough to be a Featured article. Arenal was awsome, I love the hotsprings. What a great country, I just wish I had gotten more wikipedia-worthy pics. Heh every time I go on vacation now I always make sure to scan the main articles before I leave to see if there are pictures I should take. I have no idea if I know you, if you have spent time in MN it is a possibility otherwise, probably not. :) - Ravedave 18:29, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * You look like a skydiver I know. Thanks for the encouragement.  I keep a log of photos I need to take when I travel, too.  I've got some down time, so I'm working through my Russian images from 2005.  I haven't explored the non-English language portions of the site, but I'm guessing I should see if my photos might be of use on those pages, too.  Any tips on working with articles in other languages?
 * No problem. And hey you know what, just keep adding the articles, I'll just make sure to cleanup behind you. I don't have any current project, so that will be my project, categorizign and stub catorizing your articles. Working with forign language sites can be hard. I would just add the pictures to the english articles. I know in many other languages they have WikiProjects simply devoted to getting information from the english and other language wikis. You might want to try and hook up with a wikipedia who knows russian (or whatever language) that can add meaningful captions. You should ask at the Village pump. Oh and what tpye of camera & lens are you using? Your animal pictures have great color & sharpness. -Ravedave 18:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your offer to help! I've made sure that each article is linked to by some other article, so categorizing shouldn't be hard.  It's just not something I thought about when I created them.  There's only a few.  I've got friends who speak pretty much all the wiki languages.  I'll see if I can recruit them to help.  That's a secondary project, though.


 * You can find the camera/lens information under each image's Metadata (Show extended details). My long lens is a Promaster Spectrum 7 XR.  My wide angle is a Canon Zoom Lens EF-S 10-22mm.  My DV camera is a Sony DCR-PC100, but it's just about worn out, so I probably won't have it much longer.  I shot hundreds of hours of video and thousands of images with it, so some of them will probably turn up here.  Rklawton 19:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination
I thought your picture of the Fiji Banded Iguana is great so I nominated it as a featured picture cantidate. Check out Featured picture candidates. Hopefully it makes it! -Ravedave 05:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Good to hear from you on the FPC. Could you try getting the entire subject (or at least as much as possible of it) the next time you do a shoot? If you have to cut part of it, I would like to see a portrait head on. - Mgm|(talk) 09:20, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

User:Sacredvisions

 * Dude, stay the fuck off my talk page! --SacredVisions 20:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Wrong guy. User:Slyder Pilot put that message on your page.  Check your page's history and then calm down.  Rklawton 00:57, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Apologies. --SacredVisions 01:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Accepted. Rklawton 01:41, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

DUDE!
What's your deal? It's my talk page. Go back to your nerdery and take more pictures. -- Slyder Pilot E@ 20:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I think the deal is that you aren't very familiar with the culture here, and you keep butting heads up against it. It's not customary to delete items from you talk page (archiving is a different matter).  If you wish to do well on your next RfA, you'll want to avoid (or correct) these kinds of mistakes.  Rklawton 20:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Slyder Pilot
I left him a gentle warning on his talk page. We'll see if that does any good. I'm inclined to let the removals he's already made stand, but would take a further line if he does it again in the future. I don't think a formal warning message would help right now - a softer approach may get better results. We'll see. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Best, Gwernol 20:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with your approach. Thanks for pitching in.  Rklawton 21:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Will read up on archiving later tonight. That is all and good day. -- Slyder Pilot E@ 21:15, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

User:TheLinguist
Re: Comments

First, Rklawton looks too obstinate, but then you understand that he just wants to be as fair as possible. Overall, I would say that he is a great asset to Wikipedia, and he made me like Wikipedia even more. by TheLinguist

User:The Mystery Man
Apologies; I went over the user's 30 most recent edits and found a few issues with WP:COPY (images) and WP:NPOV, and not the kind of false information your report suggested. If an editor has made numerous edits since the vandalism, please provide "diffs" (links to the specific edits) as Netsnipe suggested. Thanks :) RadioKirk (u|t|c)  05:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, that diff helped, thanks. At the moment, though, I cannot consider the account "vandalism only" and blocks are preventative, not punitive, so, presuming you're keeping an eye on that user, feel free to report him again if the activity starts up. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c)  13:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Will do. Rklawton 13:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

User:The Mystery Man
Okay, I've checked; of a couple dozen uploads since the block expired, two were copyvios. I'd call that a drastic improvement. As for this edit, however... no explanation yet... ;) RadioKirk (u|t|c)  23:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * If he replies, I'll be surprised. At any rate, folks can learn, it's true.  I'll keep an eye on things.  Oversights are one thing, but blatant copyvios and talk page blanking are another.  Rklawton 00:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

19 December 2006
I thought was working on it? RadioKirk (u|t|c)  02:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Help
I was trying to get someone to fix the hello article. thank you for the welcome.

stop stalking me
Im getting scared :x btw how do I leave a sig or something like everyone else has. Does wikipedia editing use html?

Vandalism
+1 to your count. ; ) Restrored your page back from a vandal. (unsigned)
 * Thanks, he's peeved 'cause his no-hit website is up for AfD. Rklawton 23:43, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Wtfk
Re: rjensen at it again

I don't know what's with this guy, but I want to thank you for standing up to his ham-handed tactics. He's making himself a real PITA on the FDR article by vetoing any NPOV changes and dictatorially removing the POV tag without comment, after less than 24 hours. Anyway, thanks for being among those willing to resist him. What&#39;s the frequency, Kenneth? 01:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Not sure How to start a discusion But I need Help
I uploaded a image That belongs to me a photo of my wedding on my user page but I got a message saying it was going to be deleated because it said it has no copyright info, But it belongs to me. and I am not sure how to add the stuff it wanted

Thanks User:Zeleniak
 * Just follow the instructions posted on your talk page. In this case, you simply failed to specify the type of copywrite.  It's no big deal, really.  However, you will want to read through a few to see which one suits your needs best.  I prefer CC 2.5 so that my name stays with the image where ever it goes.  Rklawton 02:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)