User:Rky497/Natasha Sheybani/DavidMHuang12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Rky497


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Rky497/Natasha Sheybani


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:Rky497/Natasha Sheybani

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Overall, the page looks good! You have a clear understanding of what material you want to include. The structure of the page is well laid out and easy to navigate. I clearly understand the impact and work this individual as done, shown in the the awards section and the publications.

I see that you aren't completely finished with your page, so there are some incomplete paragraphs. The Early Life section might be difficult to be complete without actually interviewing your person of interest. Also it would be interesting to read about why she choose her specific field. You focused a lot on her education (which is okay), but it would be cool to mention things she does outside of academia.