User:Rmradack/Climate Justice/Aurebal Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Rmradack
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Rmradack/Climate Justice

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Clear introductory sentence about climate change leading to the discussion of climate justice.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, it gives a clear description about the climate justice programs created which goes into talking about the protests taken place later in the article.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, all information in the lead is included in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is not overly detailed, it give a clear idea as to what the article is going to be about.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, great way of incorporating different organizations related to the topic and how they work to enforce climate justice.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, information used is up-to-date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? All content belongs to the topic of climate justice.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, it is all information and no personal opinions or bias about the topic of climate justice.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There is no bias, the content is neutral and information based.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, it does not persuade the reader. It is informing the reader about the topic of climate justice by explaining climate justice and what has been contributed in order for a change to happen.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? There are no sources of informations referenced in the article.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Content is clear and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? There are some grammatical errors, reread to fix those up.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, it is broken down into different sections reflecting major points related to the topic.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No images used.
 * Are images well-captioned? No images used.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No images.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No images used.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, the content added makes the idea of climate justice more clear . In adding the different organizations that fight for climate justice and give an insight about the political approaches, gives the reader a better understanding.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The strengths include the overall idea of what climate change is and why the idea of climate justice exists. It shows the political approaches related to the topic.
 * How can the content added be improved? Maybe by adding more content on the political approaches on climate justice. For example, how have these political approaches about climate change evolved over time?