User:Rmradack/Climate Justice/Hluther Peer Review

Peer Review: My page didn't lead to the guiding questions. Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - Yes Does the lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - Yes it does Does the lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - Yes Does the lead include information that is not present in the article? - Yes Is the lead concise overall detailed? - Yes Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes Is the content added up to date? - Yes Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - No Is the content added neutral? - Yes Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - No Are there viewpoints that are over represented or under represented? - No Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? - No Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Yes Are the sources thorough - Yes Are the sources current? - Yes Check the links. Do they work? - Yes Is the content added well written? - Yes Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - No Is the content added well organized? -Yes Has the content added improved the article? - Yes the article appears to be more complete. The original article seems very vague and not specific in detail and the authors added more detail that is helpful toward the article. What are the strengths of the content added? - I think their major strengths are adding current issues such as a protest that happened in 2019 so it is quite relevant and clear that we are dealing with this issue as of now so people will be more interested in it. How can the content added be improved? - I would consider revising some of the terms that might be confusing to people reading it. I would also add more case studies because that was part of their strengths. Overall evaluation - I think overall, they did a great job with their article. They added much more information than what was on their Wikipedia page and it is really useful and relevant information. Their sources are also reliable and they used a lot. I think their page is organized, well done, and easy to follow which is what people look for when they are searching for information.
 * Bulleted list item