User:Rn15440/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
En passant

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I picked this article because I find chess interesting, and I think that en passant is an exciting and unique game rule.

Evaluate the article
The article opens with a basic description of the rule, which, considering its relative complexity, is quite concise. The opening also seems to touch on all major sections of the article.

Considering the fact that this game rule has been in place for centuries, the content is indeed up to date. There is no bias one way or another, which is partially due to the impartial nature of the topic itself.

The article is thoroughly cited, with any claims having links to their sources. The links are all indeed functional.

The writing is also good - it discloses the notation used for chess movements in the beginning of the article, and is consistent in using it throughout. The organization is good, the article is broken down into logical sections.

The images used are all relevant, and are laid out in such a way that it is easy to understand what is being shown.

Overall, I think this is a good article, effectively explaining the concept, history, and uses of the en passant rule in chess. The sources are well-cited, and the organization is clean and easy to follow. In terms of development, I think it covers everything it could need to cover. In general, a well-done article.