User:Rnu6uff/Sexual abuse in Hollywood/Kmcphers128 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Rnu6uff
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Sexual abuse in the American film industry

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No, it seems to be lopsided towards two of the cases. I suppose that's because they're bookending the subject, and they're most significant, but I think the lead should at lease mention what else will be covered in the article
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? although it pains me to say, Harvey's position is not touched on much. I listened to a podcast interviewing his lawyer and what she said about his defense was super interesting. Is probably worth mentioning why he believes he's innocent.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Persuades towards the victim.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media- None


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? I don't know if the article is more complete, it seems there has only been content added tot he Harvey Weinstein section so it could be worth your time to look at the other players in the article.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? They add more contemporary info to the Weinstein case.
 * How can the content added be improved? I think he has been found guilty if I'm not mistaken. Should update his ruling.

Overall evaluation
I like that the content you're looking to add takes a look at the bigger picture of the implications of sexual assault in hollywood. I think you need to look more at the other characters in the story on this article, but for now it's a good start!