User:RobertJastrzebski/Communist League of Indochina/Rpath02 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Catjhy, RobertJastrzebski, Siennaguo


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RobertJastrzebski/Communist_League_of_Indochina?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article concerning the Communist League of Indonesia provides a detailed, decidedly neutral understanding of the League, it's inception, and the history behind its inception. This is done while providing details on notable figures within the organisation itself. The article is well-structured and provides readers with in-depth information without the demerits of bias. Additionally, the media is well-placed and referenced. More notably, the sources are varied, in-depth, and provide a multicultural understanding of the league with references to local, national sources as well. The article is also well-linked and therefore accessible, and the references are well-placed and accurate in most cases. I particularly liked the references to the Chinese Nationalist party and how the article managed to reference and detail the split without veering away from neutrality. The sources are also well-examined and objectively reliable.

One point of improvement could involve the lack of any defining achievements and milestones that the League achieved. The nature of the league and its history are well-documented, as is its dissolution, but there are no references to what it actually achieved during the course of its achievements or the legacy it left behind. Additionally, placing an image showcasing the League's symbol might make the article more inviting to audiences. Providing an additional section on the legacy and expanding upon the major figures in the league would also help in providing more depth to the article in terms of its functioning and its impact on the region itself. Additionally, providing more detail on each section and personalising it to fit the content of the article would aid tremendously in emphasising both its reliability (that is, making it more detailed) and make it far more accessible to viewer bases.

The great image placement and link usage are things that I think my article lacks-- and I have therefore managed to gain an understanding on how to do so more comprehensively after examining this particular article. Additionally, its organisation and use of clear and precise language has allowed me to criticise my own work and look at it more objectively.